Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Arta Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$60k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Arta Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Arta Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $100k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
5
’18
9
’19
4
’20
0
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$1.4MReligion$194kFood & Nutrition$60kEducation$10kInternational$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$750Health$100
02FY2019 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA TORAS EMECHO$60,000
CHEDER TORAS ZEV$10,000
YESHIVA DERECH CHAIM$10,000
YESHIVA NACHLEI TORAH$5,000
I S KOSLOFF TORAH ACADEMY HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$5,000
CONGREGATION BNOS DEVORAH$5,000
HAKOLLEL KS$2,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH$2,000
LINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FOOD FOR FAMILIES INC: $60k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 5 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +58% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$173k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+58%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YT
    YESHIVA TORAS IMECHO INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $155k
  • LS
    LINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $6k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH
    4× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • JT
    JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • YD
    YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH
    one grant, 2017 · $100
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100 · revenue +58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
4
Yeshiva Har Torah

A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.

—
5
Yeshiva Gedola Na'os Yaakov

A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study

Education
6
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
7
Yeshiva Tiferes Boruch

A jewish secondary school which seeks to inculcate its students with high character and religious values to produce future religious leaders

—
8
Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc

Yeshiva toras aron is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood nj.

Education
9
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
10
Toras Chaim the Rabbi Chaim Shereshevsky Institute of Mesorah

Private day school serving grades pre-k3 through 8.

Education
11
Yeshiva Kol Torah Inc

Education

Education
12
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Nachlei Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is West Side Hatzoloh. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,423,555 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCYESHIVA TORAS IMECHO INC: $155,000 · OtherYESHIVA TORA…YESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $10,000 · OtherYESHIVA DERE…+7 more: $19,298 · Other+7 moreFOOD FOR FAMILIES INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $10,000 · EducationIS KOSLOFF TORAH ACADEMY HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $5,000 · EducationYESHIVA NACHLEI TORAH INC: $5,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH: $6,050 · InternationalWest Side Hatzoloh: $750 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $100 · Health
Philanthropy$1,423,555Other$184,298Human Services$60,000Education$20,000International$6,050Health$850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FOR FAMILIES INC: $60,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH: $6,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIS KOSLOFF TORAH ACADEMY HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA NACHLEI TORAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY20.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · The Ohr Hakotel Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arta Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arta Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Cheder Toras Zev: 17% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Nachlei Torah Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arta’s filings →

More from the funding graph