Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

The Arta Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
9
Organizations funded FY2019
67%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Arta Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Arta Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $100k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
5
’18
9
’19
4
’20
0
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$60,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 9
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
4
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 67% of the organizations The Arta Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 37% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20199$100k67%
FY20186$63k50%
FY20176$5kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$1.4MReligion$194kFood & Nutrition$60kEducation$10kInternational$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$750Health$100

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Yeshiva Toras Imecho Inc$155,0003n/a
Food for Families Inc$60,000110%
Yeshiva Derech Chaim$10,00010%
Cheder Toras Zev$10,00010%
Lincoln Square Synagogue Inc$6,0983n/a
American Friends of Eretz Hemdah$6,05040%
Congregation Ramath Orah Inc$5,0002n/a
Cong Bnos Devorah Inc$5,0001n/a
Is Kosloff Torah Academy High School for Girls$5,00010%
Yeshiva Nachlei Torah Inc$5,00013%
Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of The Arta Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Yeshiva Toras Imecho Inc$155,0003n/a
Food for Families Inc$60,000110%
Yeshiva Derech Chaim$10,00010%
Cheder Toras Zev$10,00010%
Lincoln Square Synagogue Inc$6,0983n/a
American Friends of Eretz Hemdah$6,05040%
Congregation Ramath Orah Inc$5,0002n/a
Cong Bnos Devorah Inc$5,0001n/a
Is Kosloff Torah Academy High School for Girls$5,00010%
Yeshiva Nachlei Torah Inc$5,00013%
Hakollel Ks Inc$2,0001n/a
Jewish Theological Seminary of America$1,0001n/a
West Side Hatzoloh$7502n/a
Chai Lifeline Inc$10010%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($200), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY20.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · The Ohr Hakotel Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Arta Foundation with peer funders

About The Arta Foundation

How much does The Arta Foundation give?
The Arta Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $99,500 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 9 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does The Arta Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Philanthropy (84%), Religion (11%), Food & Nutrition (4%).
Who are The Arta Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Yeshiva Toras Imecho Inc ($155k), Food for Families Inc ($60k), Yeshiva Derech Chaim ($10k).
Does The Arta Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Arta Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Arta Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, The Ojc Fund, The Ohr Hakotel Foundation.
Where is The Arta Foundation based?
The Arta Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arta’s filings →

More from the funding graph