Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Art and Phyllis Grindle Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$234k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$79k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$725kAnimals$649kHealth$230kScience & Tech$110kArts & Culture$88kFood & Nutrition$70kEnvironment$30kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $79k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION FOR SEMIONLE ST COLLEGE$79,000
FRANKLIN'S FRIENDS$40,000
SAVE A LIFE PET RESCUE$30,000
FREEDOM RIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM$25,000
PET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO$20,000
AUDUBON CENTER FOR BIRDS PREY$15,000
HEARTLAND HAVEN FOUNDATION$10,000
THE HAVEN FOR INJURED ORPHANED WI$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LAKE CARES INC: $18k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $17k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $10k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $10k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $10k → 10%LAKE CARES INC: $5k → 10%FREEDOM RIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM: $30k → 13%FREEDOM RIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM: $25k → 13%FREEDOM RIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM: $25k → 13%FREEDOM RIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM: $20k → 13%FREEDOM RIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM: $15k → 13%FREEDOM RIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM: $15k → 13%FREEDOM RIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM: $10k → 13%FREEDOM RIDE REHABILITATION PROGRAM: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 18 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$1.9M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+37%

Still filing today

56%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $194k · revenue +24%
  • SA
    SAVE A LIFE PET RESCUE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $168k · revenue +23%
  • FR
    FREEDOM RIDE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $150k · revenue +149%

Funded once

  • VS
    VOLUSIA SOCIETY FOR AID TO ANIMALS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CF
    CARE FELINE TNR INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • OS
    Orlando Shakespeare Theater Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spca of North Florida Inc
Animals
2
Florida Animal Protection Foundation
Animals
3
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
4
Florida Animal Friend Inc

The mission of the organizaton is to help save the lives of countless unwanted cats and dogs by supporting organizations that offer free or low- cost spay and neuter services across the state of florida.

Animals
5
Spca of North Brevard Inc

Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Animals
6
South Florida Pet Rescue and Rehabilitation Inc

From charitable contributions recieved the organization uses these funds to rescue, provide the necessary veterinary services, maintanance and rehabilitates distressed animals.

Animals
7
Boardwalk Pet Rescue

Pet rescue

Animals
8
Rescue Pets of Florida Inc

Animal rescue

Animals
9
North Florida Animal Rescue Inc

To rescue, provide sanctuary, and re-home abandoned animals, thereby reducing euthanasia, through education and innovative community programs.

Animals
10
Fluff Animal Rescue Inc

Fluff Animal Rescue exists to save lives and make a difference, through community awareness, assistance, education and rescue, we aim to confront animal over-population and shelter over-crowding.

Animals
11
Brevard Spay Neuter Clinic Inc

Provide spay-nueter services and vetinary care for dogs & cats of brevard county from the animal shelters and abandome dogs & cats

Animals
12
Saving Paws Rescue of Florida Inc

To assist in the medical care, misc care and rehoming of animals that do not have a home

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc; the most unlike its peers is Paws Against Domestic Violence Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE: $532,520 · OtherSEMINOLE STATE COLLEGEFOUNDATION FOR SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC: $192,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INCAUDOBON CENTER FOR BIRDS PREY: $41,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherHAVEN FOR INJURED AND ORPHANED WILDLIFE INC: $31,000 · Other+7 more: $90,000 · Other+7 morePET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $194,000 · AnimalsPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLAND…SAVE A LIFE PET RESCUE INC: $167,500 · AnimalsSAVE A LIFE PET RESCUE INCFRANKLIN'S FRIENDS INC: $75,000 · AnimalsFRANKLIN'S FRIENDS INCHALIFAX HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $70,000 · AnimalsHALIFAX HUMANE SOCIETY INC+3 more: $25,000 · AnimalsFREEDOM RIDE INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM RIDE…Lake Cares Inc: $70,000 · Human ServicesLake Cares I…ATLANTIC CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $77,500 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC …ORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureORLANDO S…Orlando Shakespeare Theater Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureOrlando S…NATURE'S ACADEMY INC: $80,000 · EnvironmentCENTRAL CARIBBEAN MARINE INSTITUTE INC: $35,000 · Science & Tech
Other$922,020Animals$531,500Human Services$220,000Arts & Culture$162,500Environment$80,000Science & Tech$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $194,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC: $192,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSAVE A LIFE PET RESCUE INC: $167,500 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetFREEDOM RIDE INC: $150,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetNATURE'S ACADEMY INC: $80,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetATLANTIC CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $77,500 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetFRANKLIN'S FRIENDS INC: $75,000 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHALIFAX HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLake Cares Inc: $70,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCENTRAL CARIBBEAN MARINE INSTITUTE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHeartland Haven Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetOrlando Shakespeare Theater Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A LIFE PET RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM RIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURE'S ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN'S FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds HALIFAX HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Lake Cares Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CARIBBEAN MARINE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Heartland Haven Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CARE FELINE TNR INC ↗
  • Who funds Orlando Shakespeare Theater Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAWS AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Universal Orlando Foundation IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Art and Phyllis Grindle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Art and Phyllis Grindle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Atlantic Center for the Arts Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Orlando Science Centerinc: 4% of income from government
  • Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Halifax Humane Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Art and Phyllis Grindle Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Art and Phyllis Grindle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Art and Phyllis Grindle’s filings →

More from the funding graph