Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Arnold Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$724kYouth Development$304kHousing & Shelter$259kEducation$60k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG$50,000
WANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION$25,000
VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC$25,000
DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD$20,000
SMYAL$10,000
OPERATION WILDCAT$10,000
THE JANUS SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $849k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OPERATION WILDCAT: $10k → 8%DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $20k → 9%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $33k → 11%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $33k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%SMYAL: $10k → 14%OPERATION WILDCAT: $10k → 8%DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $20k → 9%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $33k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%SMYAL: $10k → 14%OPERATION WILDCAT: $10k → 8%DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $20k → 9%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $30k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%SMYAL: $10k → 14%OPERATION WILDCAT: $5k → 8%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%SMYAL: $10k → 14%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%SMYAL: $10k → 14%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$1.3M
$0

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YG
    YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG
    9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +36%
  • WA
    WANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $259k · revenue +220%
  • VY
    VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $254k · revenue +92%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    New Alternatives for Lgbt Homeless Youth Inc

    Provide social services to LGBT teens in the NYC area. Life skills training, meals, and social work services were offered to an average of 60 young adults a week.

    Housing & Shelter
    2
    Ywca of Central Virginia

    The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

    Human Services
    3
    Ywca Dayton

    YWCA Dayton is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

    —
    4
    Stonewall Youth

    Stonewall Youth empowers LGBTQ2S+ youth to speak for themselves educate their communities support each other and work for social justice

    Human Services
    5
    Inside Out Youth Services

    To build access, equity, and power with lgbtqia2+ young people.

    Youth Development
    6
    Proud Haven Inc

    Our mission is to provide a safe shelter and resources for LGBTQIA youth and young adults experiencing homelessness. We also provide resources and support to all members of the LGBTQIA population.

    Arts & Culture
    7
    Mountain Plains Youth Works

    Mountain plains youth works provides a comprehensive range of support services for youth and their families to meet goals for strong, healthy relationships.

    Human Services
    8
    Young Women's Christian Association Greater Pittsburgh

    Ywca greater pittsburgh is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. we envision a community that advances education, opportunity, and equity regardless of gender, race, or…

    Human Services
    9
    Young Women's Christian Association of Bellingham

    YWCA Bellingham is part of a national network of programs with the shared mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, and freedom for all.

    Human Services
    10
    The Ywca of Western New York Inc

    The organization provides child care, housing, job training, health and wellness, and leadership development programs, as well as advocacy on racial justice and women's issues.

    Human Services
    11
    Mulligans Manor

    The organization is a loving, nurturing and supportive group home dedicated to caring for and empowering youth, lgbtq youth in particular, ranging from 12 to 17 years old who are in need of such services.

    —
    12
    Youth Seen

    The mission of Youth Seenis to foster and empower the social and emotional well-being of LGBTQI youth and their families.

    Youth Development
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Youth House Committee Inc; the most unlike its peers is Operation Wildcat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/8
    Grantees still filing
    8/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG: $450,000 · Human ServicesYWCA GREATER HARRISBURGVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $254,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INCDOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $60,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN DAILY BREADSMYAL Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesSMYAL IncOPERATION WILDCAT: $35,000 · Human ServicesWANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC: $259,000 · Housing & ShelterWANDA ALSTON FOUNDATI…CASA RUBY INC: $179,000 · OtherCASA RUBY INCTHE JANUS SCHOOL: $60,000 · Education
    Human Services$849,000Housing & Shelter$259,000Other$179,000Education$60,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYWCA GREATER HARRISBURG: $450,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetWANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC: $259,000 over 9y, 7.1% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $254,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCASA RUBY INC: $179,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetTHE JANUS SCHOOL: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $60,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSMYAL Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION WILDCAT: $35,000 over 4y, 15% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG ↗
    • Who funds WANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC ↗
    • Who funds CASA RUBY INC ↗
    • Who funds THE JANUS SCHOOL ↗
    • Who funds DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD ↗
    • Who funds SMYAL Inc ↗
    • Who funds OPERATION WILDCAT ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Arnold Family FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Arnold Family Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Arnold Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arnold Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Arnold Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to The Arnold Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Arnold’s filings →

      More from the funding graph