Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Arnold Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$724kYouth Development$304kHousing & Shelter$259kEducation$60k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG$50,000
VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC$25,000
WANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION$25,000
DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD$20,000
OPERATION WILDCAT$10,000
THE JANUS SCHOOL$10,000
SMYAL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $849k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OPERATION WILDCAT: $10k → 8%DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $20k → 9%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $33k → 11%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $33k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%SMYAL: $10k → 14%OPERATION WILDCAT: $10k → 8%DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $20k → 9%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $33k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%SMYAL: $10k → 14%OPERATION WILDCAT: $10k → 8%DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $20k → 9%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $30k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%SMYAL: $10k → 14%OPERATION WILDCAT: $5k → 8%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%SMYAL: $10k → 14%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%SMYAL: $10k → 14%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC: $25k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%YWCA OF GREATER HARRISBURG: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$1.3M
$0

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YG
    YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG
    9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +36%
  • WA
    WANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $259k · revenue +220%
  • VY
    VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $254k · revenue +92%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    New Alternatives for Lgbt Homeless Youth Inc

    Provide social services to LGBT teens in the NYC area. Life skills training, meals, and social work services were offered to an average of 60 young adults a week.

    Housing & Shelter
    2
    Ywca of Central Virginia

    The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

    Human Services
    3
    Ywca Dayton

    YWCA Dayton is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

    4
    Stonewall Youth

    Stonewall Youth empowers LGBTQ2S+ youth to speak for themselves educate their communities support each other and work for social justice

    Human Services
    5
    Inside Out Youth Services

    To build access, equity, and power with lgbtqia2+ young people.

    Youth Development
    6
    Proud Haven Inc

    Our mission is to provide a safe shelter and resources for LGBTQIA youth and young adults experiencing homelessness. We also provide resources and support to all members of the LGBTQIA population.

    Arts & Culture
    7
    Mountain Plains Youth Works

    Mountain plains youth works provides a comprehensive range of support services for youth and their families to meet goals for strong, healthy relationships.

    Human Services
    8
    Young Women's Christian Association Greater Pittsburgh

    Ywca greater pittsburgh is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. we envision a community that advances education, opportunity, and equity regardless of gender, race, or…

    Human Services
    9
    Young Women's Christian Association of Bellingham

    YWCA Bellingham is part of a national network of programs with the shared mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, and freedom for all.

    Human Services
    10
    The Ywca of Western New York Inc

    The organization provides child care, housing, job training, health and wellness, and leadership development programs, as well as advocacy on racial justice and women's issues.

    Human Services
    11
    Mulligans Manor

    The organization is a loving, nurturing and supportive group home dedicated to caring for and empowering youth, lgbtq youth in particular, ranging from 12 to 17 years old who are in need of such services.

    12
    Youth Seen

    The mission of Youth Seenis to foster and empower the social and emotional well-being of LGBTQI youth and their families.

    Youth Development

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Youth House Committee Inc and the most unlike its peers is Operation Wildcat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/8
    Grantees still filing
    8/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG — $450,000 · Human ServicesYWCA GREATER HARRISBURGVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $254,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INCDOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD — $60,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN DAILY BREADSMYAL Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesSMYAL IncOPERATION WILDCAT — $35,000 · Human ServicesWANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC — $259,000 · Housing & ShelterWANDA ALSTON FOUNDATI…CASA RUBY INC — $179,000 · OtherCASA RUBY INCTHE JANUS SCHOOL — $60,000 · Education
    Human Services$849,000Housing & Shelter$259,000Other$179,000Education$60,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYWCA GREATER HARRISBURG — $450,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetWANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC — $259,000 over 9y, 7.1% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $254,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCASA RUBY INC — $179,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD — $60,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE JANUS SCHOOL — $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSMYAL Inc — $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION WILDCAT — $35,000 over 4y, 15% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds YWCA GREATER HARRISBURG
    • Who funds WANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC
    • Who funds CASA RUBY INC
    • Who funds DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD
    • Who funds THE JANUS SCHOOL
    • Who funds SMYAL Inc
    • Who funds OPERATION WILDCAT

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Arnold Family FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Arnold Family Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization The Arnold Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Arnold Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to The Arnold Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph