Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Arnold and Margaret Peterson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$789kEducation$241kReligion$64kHuman Services$55kInternational$21kEnvironment$10kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEEN CHALLENGE$70,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$15,000
CARPINTERIA CHILDREN'S PROJECT$15,000
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY$12,000
NORTHEAST OF THE WELL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$2,000
LIFE WITHOUT LIMBS$1,200
HOLT INTERNATIONAL$516
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 84% of grant dollars ($1.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 16% that went abroad ($203k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIFE WITHOUT LIMBS: $1k → 5%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $516 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
OR
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
NC
TX

Beyond the US: 16% of all-years giving ($203k)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Slovenia$87k · 3 grants
United Kingdom$85k · 3 grants
Taiwan$16k · 1 grant
Romania$15k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Arnold and Margaret Peterson Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Arnold and Margaret Peterson Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 11 repeat orgs$224k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$1.0M
$185k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+34%

Still filing today

18%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TEEN CHALLENGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $621k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $140k · revenue -17%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2017–2021 · $90k

Funded once

  • OU
    OXFORD UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $43k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD
    one grant, 2019 · $37k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Prison Fellowship International

To transform the lives of prisoners, their families, and victims through a global network of ministry partners.

Crime & Legal
2
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
3
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
4
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
5
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
6
Jesus Connecting the Dots
Food & Nutrition
7
No Limits Academy Inc

No limits academy seeks to glorify god by providing disabled students with the academic resources, technology, adaptive equipment and self-respect that they need to achieve their fullest potential.

Education
8
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
9
The Porch Ministries

Our ultimate mission at the porch is clear and simple: to raise up mighty sons of god who will carry the authority of the kingdom of heaven, and make jesus known in the earth. we desire to raise up men of god who will love his truth with…

Religion
10
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
11
Luis Palau Association

Proclaiming the Good News, Uniting the Church, and Impacting Cities Worldwide.

Religion
12
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Hope Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEEN CHALLENGE: $620,564 · OtherTEEN CHALLENGEIndividual grant recipient: $89,995 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOXFORD UNIVERSITY: $43,336 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherFAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $38,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OXFORD: $36,635 · Other+16 more: $167,000 · Other+16 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE: $140,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIR…CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $27,000 · EducationCARPINTERIA CHILDREN'S PROJECT: $15,000 · EducationProject Hope Alliance: $5,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionNortheast of the Well: $12,000 · ReligionLife Without Limbs: $1,200 · Human ServicesHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $516 · Human Services
Other$1,035,530Youth Development$140,000Education$47,000Religion$27,000Human Services$1,716

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE: $140,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARPINTERIA CHILDREN'S PROJECT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNortheast of the Well: $12,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetProject Hope Alliance: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLife Without Limbs: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $516 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CARPINTERIA CHILDREN'S PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Northeast of the Well ↗
  • Who funds Project Hope Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Life Without Limbs ↗
  • Who funds HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arnold and Margaret Peterson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arnold and Margaret Peterson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arnold and Margaret Peterson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph