Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Arnold & Jill Bellowe Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$132kInternational$100kPhilanthropy$72kHealth$44kCrime & Legal$38kHuman Services$36kEducation$35kFood & Nutrition$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k42 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROBERT H JACKSON CENTER$14,500
MONTECITO RETIREMENT ASSOCIATON$6,000
CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION$5,400
CITY YEAR- LOS ANGLELES$5,000
QPLUS COLLECTIVE$5,000
DIRECT RELIEF INTERNATIONAL$5,000
SANSUM CLINIC$5,000
ENSEMBLE THEATER$3,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER-PALO ALTO$3,048
EDEN REFORESTATION PROJECTS$3,015
WOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA$2,750
Individual grant recipient$2,500
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$2,500
DIAMOND PEAK SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%HOPE IN A SUITCASE: $500 → 14%HOPE IN A SUITCASE: $500 → 14%HOPE IN A SUITCASE: $500 → 14%HOPE IN A SUITCASE: $500 → 14%MONTECITO RETIREMENT ASSOCIATON: $6k → 14%MONTECITO RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%MONTECITO RETIREMENT ASSOCIATON: $5k → 14%MONTECITO RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
NV
IA
OH
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$481k · 63 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

63 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
48

Total granted

$481k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+6%

Still filing today

60%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CHAUTAUQUA FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +57%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +94%
  • RH
    ROBERT H JACKSON CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • GC
    GLOBAL CONSERVATION FORCE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TA
    THE ABILITY EXPERIENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +58%
  • KF
    Kindred Films Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · 33% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
2
Santa Barbara Foundation

The mission of the santa barbara foundation (sbf) is to mobilize collective wisdom and philanthropic capital to build empathetic, inclusive and resilient communities.

Philanthropy
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
5
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
6
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
10
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
11
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
12
Santa Catalina Island Conservancy

The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Santa Barbara County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Live Like Ally Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/80
Grantees still filing
53/80
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $23,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY YEAR INC: $12,450 · OtherCITY YEAR INCSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART: $10,609 · OtherCASA DORINDA FOUNDATION: $10,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,708 · OtherENSEMBLE THEATER: $7,000 · OtherFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $9,000 · OtherCHAUTAUQUA WATERSHED CONSERVANCY INC: $9,500 · OtherGLOBAL CONSERVATION FORCE INC: $10,000 · OtherTRANSITION HOUSE: $9,000 · Other+68 more: $84,384 · Other+68 moreCHAUTAUQUA FOUNDATION INC: $57,800 · PhilanthropyCHAUTAUQUA FOUNDATION IN…WOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA: $24,250 · PhilanthropyWOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BA…JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $23,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLE…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA: $18,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GRE…+4 more: $4,500 · PhilanthropyDIRECT RELIEF: $49,272 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFEDEN PEOPLEPLANET: $24,015 · InternationalEDEN PEOPLEPLANETHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $22,500 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH …+3 more: $2,937 · InternationalROBERT H JACKSON CENTER INC: $35,700 · Arts & CultureROBERT H JACKSON…CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $18,800 · Arts & CultureCHAUTAUQUA INSTI…ENSEMBLE THEATRE COMPANY OF SANTA BARBARA INC: $15,350 · Arts & CultureENSEMBLE THEATRE…Kindred Films Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKindred Films In…NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER INC: $3,950 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $7,850 · Arts & Culture+6 moreSANSUM CLINIC: $23,000 · HealthSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $2,500 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $2,350 · HealthCouncil on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse: $1,250 · Health+4 more: $2,350 · HealthMONTECITO RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION: $16,200 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHOPE IN A SUITCASE: $2,000 · Human ServicesPATH: $2,000 · Human Services+2 more: $302 · Human ServicesTHE FOUNDATION FOR SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE: $14,500 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education+4 more: $1,450 · Education
Other$200,701Philanthropy$127,550International$98,724Arts & Culture$86,650Health$31,450Human Services$25,502Education$17,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAUTAUQUA FOUNDATION INC: $57,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $49,272 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT H JACKSON CENTER INC: $35,700 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA: $24,250 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEDEN PEOPLEPLANET: $24,015 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANSUM CLINIC: $23,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $18,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA: $18,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMONTECITO RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION: $16,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENSEMBLE THEATRE COMPANY OF SANTA BARBARA INC: $15,350 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE: $14,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $12,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA WATERSHED CONSERVANCY INC: $9,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTRANSITION HOUSE: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ABILITY EXPERIENCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKindred Films Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FIREFIGHTERS ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY LACROSSE: $4,000 over 1y, 74% of budgetNATIONAL COMEDY CENTER INC: $3,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $2,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPHIL SIMON CLINIC TANZANIA PROJECT: $2,575 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $2,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOBERO THEATRE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE IN A SUITCASE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPATH: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIAMOND PEAK SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $1,750 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCALM INC: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF WISDOM INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil on Alcoholism & Drug Abuse: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONTECITO FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE STREET BALLET: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSPIRATIONAL TRIATHLON RACING INTERNATIONAL CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT H JACKSON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FUND OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds EDEN PEOPLEPLANET ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds SANSUM CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA ↗
  • Who funds MONTECITO RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ENSEMBLE THEATRE COMPANY OF SANTA BARBARA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CONSERVATION FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA WATERSHED CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSITION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ABILITY EXPERIENCE ↗
  • Who funds Kindred Films Inc ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA FIREFIGHTERS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY LACROSSE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PHIL SIMON CLINIC TANZANIA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA34.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · California Community Foundation · Manitou Fund · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Giles 2000 Tr Dba Giles Family Foundation · The Turpin-Allebrand Family Charitable Foundation · Mosher Foundation · The Corwin D Denney Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arnold & Jill Bellowe Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arnold & Jill Bellowe Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arnold & Jill Bellowe Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph