Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Arcadia Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2019
11
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$211k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2019 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $211k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$882k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL$211,459
SPARTANBURG COUNTY FOUNDATION$23,000
JUDICIAL WATCH INC$10,000
ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC$8,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
THE SPARTANBURG REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION$3,000
NATIONAL LEGAL & POLICY CENTER$3,000
EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE ADVENT$3,000
TAX FOUNDATION$3,000
CHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC$3,000
BALLET GUILD OF SPARTANBURG INC$2,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 10%ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $8k → 15%TAX FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%NATIONAL LEGAL & POLICY CENTER: $3k → 4%CHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC: $3k → 15%SPARTANBURG COUNTY FOUNDATION: $23k → 15%BALLET GUILD OF SPARTANBURG INC: $3k → 15%EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE ADVENT: $3k → 15%THE SPARTANBURG REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%SPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL: $211k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
2
South Carolina Council On Competitiveness

The south carolina council on competitiveness is a nonpartisan, business-led non-profit organization committed to advancing the long term competitiveness of south carolina through actionable research, support of industry clusters and…

Community Improvement
3
South Carolina Policy Council Education Foundation

The south carolina policy council was founded in 1986 as an independent, private, non-partisan research organization to promote the principles of limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty and responsibility in the state…

—
4
South Carolina Legal Services

South carolina legal services is a statewide law firm that provides civil legal services to protect the rights and represent the interests of low income south carolinians.

Crime & Legal
5
South Carolina Council On Economic Education

Sc economics is the only sc non-profit organization exclusively dedicated to improving economic education and financial literacy by preparing teachers and students to be active, successful, and prosperous members of our global economy.

—
6
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
7
Sc Educational Communications Inc

South Carolina Educational Communications, Inc. ("SCEC") supports and promotes educational public media activities in South Carolina and across the United States, including the development and creation of original content for broadcast and…

Arts & Culture
8
State Government Affairs Council

To advance and support the state government affairs profession by fostering community among peers and elected officials, building knowledge, and promoting diverse perspectives in a nonpartisan environment.

Community Improvement
9
Southern Bancorp Capital Partners

Creating economic opportunities in distressed rural communities.

—
10
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

—
11
Social Science Research Council

The social science research council is an independent, international nonprofit organization. it fosters innovative research, nurtures new generations of social scientists, and deepens how inquiry is practiced within and across disciplines.

Social Science
12
South Carolina Business & Industry Political Education Committee

Promoting and protecting the free private and competitive enterprise system through research and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spartanburg County Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tax Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL: $211,459 · OtherSPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL+3 more: $10,500 · OtherSpartanburg County Foundation: $23,000 · PhilanthropySpartanbu…JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $10,000 · Public BenefitTAX FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Public BenefitADULT LEARNING CENTER: $8,000 · EducationCHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureSpartanburg Regional Healthcare System Foundation: $3,000 · HealthNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $3,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$221,959Philanthropy$23,000Public Benefit$13,000Education$8,000Arts & Culture$3,000Health$3,000Crime & Legal$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL: $211,459 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSpartanburg County Foundation: $23,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADULT LEARNING CENTER: $8,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTAX FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpartanburg Regional Healthcare System Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alfred Moore FoundationGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alfred Moore Foundation · Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation · Betty & James K Stone Foundation · Anna M Black Charitable Foundation · J M Smith Foundation · Spartanburg County Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arcadia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arcadia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arcadia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph