Skip to content

South Carolina · Private foundation

Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$276k
Granted FY2023
16
Grants FY2023
15
Organizations funded FY2023
47%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

55% of Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Spartanburg County Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $276k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’18
10
’19
9
’20
11
’21
11
’22
9
’23
3
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2023
$7,500
Largest grant, FY2023
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 23
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
3
Total assets, FY2023
$7.3M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 47% of the organizations Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 8% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202315$238k47%
FY202217$262k6%
FY202116$262k38%
FY202013$317k8%
FY201920$367k30%
FY201823$421kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$1.0MPhilanthropy$545kReligion$355kHealth$284kArts & Culture$36kRecreation & Sports$30kCrime & Legal$26kHuman Services$16kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
MI
NY
CA
CO
VA
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 23 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 22 recipients with no EIN on record ($701k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChrist School Inc: $400,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSpartanburg Day School: $350,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetWofford College: $190,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of the Piedmont Inc: $165,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetConverse University: $62,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChapman Cultural Center Inc: $33,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Upstate Foundation: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLake Summit Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetGroup of 100 Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSouth Carolina Policy Council Education Foundation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUpstate Warrior Solution Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCato Institute: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Choice in Education: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Garden Conservancy Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPiedmont Physic Garden: $1,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPardee Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWounded Warrior Project Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdult Learning Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Bailey Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Independent Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpartanburg Philharmonic: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpartanburg Community College Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 22.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spartanburg County FoundationSC28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spartanburg County Foundation · J M Smith Foundation · Arkwright Foundation · Betty James and Walter S Montgomery Jr Foundation · Betty & James K Stone Foundation · Black & Phillips Foundation Inc · Milliken & Company Charitable Foundation · Anna M Black Charitable Foundation · Gibbs Charitable Foundation · Harry H Gibson Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Alfred Moore Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation

How much does Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation give?
Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation reported 16 grants totaling $275,750 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 23 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (44%), Philanthropy (23%), Religion (15%).
Who are Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Christ School Inc ($400k), Spartanburg Day School ($350k), Wofford College ($190k).
Does Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 47% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Spartanburg County Foundation, J M Smith Foundation, Arkwright Foundation.
Where is Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation based?
Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation is based in SC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rose and Walter Montgomery’s filings →

More from the funding graph