Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Arcadia Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2019
11
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$211k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2019 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $211k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$882k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL$211,459
SPARTANBURG COUNTY FOUNDATION$23,000
JUDICIAL WATCH INC$10,000
ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC$8,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
NATIONAL LEGAL & POLICY CENTER$3,000
EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE ADVENT$3,000
CHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC$3,000
THE SPARTANBURG REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION$3,000
TAX FOUNDATION$3,000
BALLET GUILD OF SPARTANBURG INC$2,500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 10%ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $8k → 15%TAX FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%NATIONAL LEGAL & POLICY CENTER: $3k → 4%CHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC: $3k → 15%SPARTANBURG COUNTY FOUNDATION: $23k → 15%BALLET GUILD OF SPARTANBURG INC: $3k → 15%EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE ADVENT: $3k → 15%THE SPARTANBURG REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%SPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL: $211k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
2
South Carolina Council On Competitiveness

The south carolina council on competitiveness is a nonpartisan, business-led non-profit organization committed to advancing the long term competitiveness of south carolina through actionable research, support of industry clusters and…

Community Improvement
3
South Carolina Policy Council Education Foundation

The south carolina policy council was founded in 1986 as an independent, private, non-partisan research organization to promote the principles of limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty and responsibility in the state…

4
South Carolina Legal Services

South carolina legal services is a statewide law firm that provides civil legal services to protect the rights and represent the interests of low income south carolinians.

Crime & Legal
5
South Carolina Council On Economic Education

Sc economics is the only sc non-profit organization exclusively dedicated to improving economic education and financial literacy by preparing teachers and students to be active, successful, and prosperous members of our global economy.

6
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
7
Sc Educational Communications Inc

South Carolina Educational Communications, Inc. ("SCEC") supports and promotes educational public media activities in South Carolina and across the United States, including the development and creation of original content for broadcast and…

Arts & Culture
8
State Government Affairs Council

To advance and support the state government affairs profession by fostering community among peers and elected officials, building knowledge, and promoting diverse perspectives in a nonpartisan environment.

Community Improvement
9
Southern Bancorp Capital Partners

Creating economic opportunities in distressed rural communities.

10
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

11
Social Science Research Council

The social science research council is an independent, international nonprofit organization. it fosters innovative research, nurtures new generations of social scientists, and deepens how inquiry is practiced within and across disciplines.

Social Science
12
South Carolina Business & Industry Political Education Committee

Promoting and protecting the free private and competitive enterprise system through research and education.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spartanburg County Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Tax Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL — $211,459 · OtherSPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL+3 more — $10,500 · OtherSpartanburg County Foundation — $23,000 · PhilanthropySpartanbu…JUDICIAL WATCH INC — $10,000 · Public BenefitTAX FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Public BenefitADULT LEARNING CENTER — $8,000 · EducationNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER — $3,000 · Crime & LegalCHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureSpartanburg Regional Healthcare System Foundation — $3,000 · Health
Other$221,959Philanthropy$23,000Public Benefit$13,000Education$8,000Crime & Legal$3,000Arts & Culture$3,000Health$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL — $211,459 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSpartanburg County Foundation — $23,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADULT LEARNING CENTER — $8,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTAX FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpartanburg Regional Healthcare System Foundation — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alfred Moore FoundationGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alfred Moore Foundation · Rose and Walter Montgomery Foundation · Betty & James K Stone Foundation · Anna M Black Charitable Foundation · J M Smith Foundation · Spartanburg County Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Arcadia Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph