Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Betty & James K Stone Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$238k
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$701kReligion$207kPhilanthropy$116kAnimals$68kHealth$48kArts & Culture$43kYouth Development$21kCrime & Legal$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
$2,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL$66,000
SPARTANBURG COUNTY FOUNDATION$23,000
LA ANNA METHODIST CHURCH$23,000
CHURCH OF THE ADVENT$20,100
Individual grant recipient$12,556
CONVERSE COLLEGE$10,000
SPARTANBURG REGIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,800
DUCKS UNLIMITED$6,059
SPARTANBURG COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,000
PROJECT REST$5,000
CENTER FOR BIRDS OF AWENDAW SC$5,000
PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF CHARLESTON$5,000
GOFORTH RECOVERY$5,000
GIVEBUTTER$4,752
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT REST: $5k → 15%SAFE HOME RAPE CRISIS COALITION: $5k → 15%GOFORTH RECOVERY: $5k → 15%GOFORTH RECOVERY: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
WY
IN
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
SC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 51 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

51 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
38

Total granted

$1.3M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+32%

Still filing today

39%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $644k · revenue +22%
  • CONVERSE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +55%
  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR ACTIVE LIVING
    4× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • CC
    COASTAL COMMUNITY FUND NORTH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SC
    SC CENTER FOR BIRDS OF PREY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CO
    CENTER OR BIRDS OF AWENDAW SC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
2
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
3
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

4
South Carolina Council On Competitiveness

The south carolina council on competitiveness is a nonpartisan, business-led non-profit organization committed to advancing the long term competitiveness of south carolina through actionable research, support of industry clusters and…

Community Improvement
5
Sc Launch Inc

Fuel south carolina's innovation economy by accelerating technology-enabled growth in research, academia, entrepreneurship and industry.

Community Improvement
6
South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities

Scicu seeks to advance higher education in south carolina through fundraising, scholarships, research, as well as facilitating collaborative activities among the member institutions. scicu also enhances a positive public image and…

Education
7
South Carolina Council On Economic Education

Sc economics is the only sc non-profit organization exclusively dedicated to improving economic education and financial literacy by preparing teachers and students to be active, successful, and prosperous members of our global economy.

8
Board of Control for Southern Regional Education

The board of control for southern regional education shall be devoted to the task of assisting states, institutions and agencies concerned with higher education in their efforts to advance knowledge and to improve the social and economic…

Education
9
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
10
South Carolina Business & Industry Political Education Committee

Promoting and protecting the free private and competitive enterprise system through research and education.

11
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission On Colleges Inc

The southern association of colleges and schools commission on colleges is the regional body for the accreditation of degree-granting higher education institutions in the southern states. the commission's mission is the enhancement of…

Education
12
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Advocacy Center of Spartanburg Cherokee - Union Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and ShelterOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Sports ProgramsPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Arts CentersDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr15%3%10–20yr24%28%20–35yr9%24%35–55yr19%45%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr15%0%10–20yr24%5%20–35yr9%3%35–55yr19%92%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
12%
3,449/28,751

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL — $643,850 · OtherSPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOLCHURCH OF THE ADVENT — $89,950 · OtherCHURCH OF THE ADVENTLA ANNA METHODIST CHURCH — $69,000 · OtherLA ANNA METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $63,800 · OtherLAANNA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $46,000 · Other+77 more — $325,027 · Other+77 moreSpartanburg County Foundation — $53,635 · Philanthropy+1 more — $250 · PhilanthropyCONVERSE UNIVERSITY — $12,600 · EducationSPARTANBURG COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · Education+4 more — $900 · EducationBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC — $19,217 · AnimalsCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY — $10,000 · AnimalsGOFORTH RECOVERY — $10,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT REST — $10,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS FOR ACTIVE LIVING — $10,650 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more — $100 · Public Safety & DisasterCHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC — $6,800 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $75 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,237,627Philanthropy$53,885Education$31,000Animals$29,217Human Services$20,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,750Arts & Culture$6,875

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL — $643,850 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetSpartanburg County Foundation — $53,635 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Preservation Society of Charleston Inc — $30,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC — $19,217 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCONVERSE UNIVERSITY — $12,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPARTANBURG COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetPARTNERS FOR ACTIVE LIVING — $10,650 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGOFORTH RECOVERY — $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT REST — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC — $6,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSPARTANBURG HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPARTANBURG PHILHARMONIC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECTORS' INVITATIONAL SKI CLASSIC — $3,605 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGROUP OF 100 INC — $3,150 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SPARTANBURG CHEROKEE - UNION INC — $2,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOTAL MINISTRIES OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY INC — $1,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOFFORD COLLEGE — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADULT LEARNING CENTER — $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPARTANBURG ART MUSEUM — $400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS UPSTATE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCROSS FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPARTANBURG AREA CONSERVANCY INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPARTANBURG METHODIST COLLEGE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetErskine College and Theological Seminary — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPARTANBURG DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds Spartanburg County Foundation
  • Who funds The Preservation Society of Charleston Inc
  • Who funds BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC
  • Who funds CONVERSE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SPARTANBURG COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR ACTIVE LIVING
  • Who funds GOFORTH RECOVERY
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds PROJECT REST
  • Who funds CHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds SPARTANBURG HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds SPARTANBURG PHILHARMONIC
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DIRECTORS' INVITATIONAL SKI CLASSIC
  • Who funds GROUP OF 100 INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spartanburg County FoundationSC48.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spartanburg County Foundation · Arkwright Foundation · J M Smith Foundation · Anna M Black Charitable Foundation · Black & Phillips Foundation Inc · Mary Black Foundation Inc · Milliken & Company Charitable Foundation · Balmer Foundation · Gibbs Charitable Foundation · Harry H Gibson Family Foundation · Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System Foundation · United Way of the Piedmont Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Betty & James K Stone Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph