Skip to content
The Antelope Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Antelope Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$145kEducation$111kInternational$84kReligion$65kHealth$35kPhilanthropy$15kCivil Rights$2k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$41k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Brotherhood Sister Sol$30,000
Maloto$20,000
Nadias Initiative$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 73% of grant dollars ($333k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 27% that went abroad ($124k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Komera: $27k → 16%Ryan Perry Foundation: $15k → 7%Maloto: $8k → 14%Echoing Green: $15k → 17%Nadias Initiative: $5k → 14%AMPLIFY Girls Inc: $25k → 14%Action in Africa: $5k → 6%Aspen Community Foundation: $5k → 7%Vermont Community Foundation: $10k → 9%Komera: $5k → 16%AMPLIFY Girls Inc: $55k → 17%GlobalGiving: $575 → 14%AMPLIFY Girls Inc: $25k → 14%New York University: $30k → 17%Nadias Initiative Inc: $5k → 14%The Brotherhood Sister Sol: $30k → 17%The Brotherhood Sister Sol: $10k → 17%New York University: $25k → 17%Maloto: $20k → 17%Maloto: $13k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 27% of all-years giving ($124k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Afghanistan$65k · 7 grants
Kenya$54k · 4 grants
Uganda$5k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$379k · 8 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$379k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+54%

Still filing today

75%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AG
    AMPLIFY GIRLS INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $105k · revenue +207%
  • NY
    New York University
    2× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue +21%
  • MI
    MALOTO INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • DD
    Dr Denis Mukwege Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • EG
    ECHOING GREEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +32%
  • TR
    THE RYAN PERRY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Global Opportunity Fund

The mission of the go fund is to provide vulnerable women and children in africa with the skills, resources and opportunities they need to lift themselves permanently out of poverty.

International
3
Ja Africa

The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.

Education
4
The Malala Fund

We work to ensure all girls can access and complete 12 years of education. by completing 12 years of quality schooling, girls will have the knowledge, skills and confidence they need to reach their full potential, make their own life…

Education
5
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
6
Impact Water Foundation

To make safe drinking water available to as many students as possible through scalable and lasting solutions, ensuring every student can learn and thrive with safe water. see schedule o.

Human Services
7
Womens Campaign International

Women's campaign international (wci) empowers girls and women around the world to actively participate and fill leadership roles in the economy, community development, civil society, and pacebuilding efforts.

International
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
9
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
10
Kakenya Center for Excellence

Invest in girls and young women from rural communities in kenya as agents of change through education, health, and skills development. we dream of a world where every girl and young woman is educated, valued, respected, and realizes her…

Education
11
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
12
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation

The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amplify Girls Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

New York University: $55,000 · EducationNew York UniversityMALOTO INC: $41,000 · EducationMALOTO INCKOMERA INC: $31,906 · EducationKOMERA INCECHOING GREEN INC: $15,000 · EducationECHOING GREEN INCOur Lady of Perpetual Support: $75,500 · OtherOur Lady of Perpetual SupportElohim Development Association: $21,000 · OtherElohim Development AssociationDr Denis Mukwege Foundation: $20,000 · OtherDr Denis Mukwege FoundationTHE RYAN PERRY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · OtherTHE RYAN PERRY FOUNDATION INCGirls to Lead Africa: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $2,000 · OtherAMPLIFY GIRLS INC: $105,000 · InternationalAMPLIFY GIRLS INCNADIA'S INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 · InternationalNADIA'S INITIATIVE INCACTION IN AFRICA INC: $5,000 · International+1 more: $575 · InternationalTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BROTH…THE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Education$142,906Other$138,500International$120,575Youth Development$40,000Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMPLIFY GIRLS INC: $105,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetNew York University: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMALOTO INC: $41,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKOMERA INC: $31,906 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetECHOING GREEN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RYAN PERRY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetNADIA'S INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION IN AFRICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $575 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Antelope Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Antelope Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Vermont Community Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Antelope Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Antelope Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Antelope’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home