· Private foundation
The Anne Beverly McCormack Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $77k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $109k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF | $17,000 |
| KING STREET CATS | $16,000 |
| RING DOG RESCUE | $15,000 |
| ALLEY CAT RESCUE INC | $14,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $13,000 |
| BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY | $12,000 |
| HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL | $12,000 |
| RED ROVER | $10,000 |
| SOCIETY OF ST FRANCIS | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
| AMERICAN HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT | $5,000 |
| VEG ER FOR PETS - ALEXANDRIA | $5,000 |
| ALLEY CAT ALLIES | $5,000 |
| AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
40 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KSKING STREET CATS4× · 2019–2025 · $49k · revenue +83%
- ACAlley Cat Rescue Inc4× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +33%
HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL4× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- BDBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INCone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue 0%
- CHCHILDRENS HOSPITALone grant, 2023 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.
To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…
The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.
Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.
Battling against the overpopulation of homeless pets and improving the lives of companion animals through rescue, fostering programs, adoption, pet care, educational programs and of course spaying and neutering.
Animal Dominion Rescue is a non-profit organization dedicated to rescuing cats and dogs worldwide, ensuring they find permanent, loving homes. The organization emphasizes direct support to rescuers on the ground, promoting animal welfare,…
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is The Rolling Dog Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KING STREET CATS ↗
- Who funds Alley Cat Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Ring Dog Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST FRANCIS ↗
- Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER ↗
- Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Alley Cat Allies Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds SPCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds The Mustique Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NOAH'S LOST ARK INC ↗
- Who funds MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Farrell Family Foundation · Susan & Jerome Ettelson Fund · Joyce a Ward Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Bernard Weinberg Foundation · John R Oltman Charitable Foundation · Morris & Arlene Goldfarb Family Foundation Inc · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · Grace and Li Yu Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Anne Beverly McCormack Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.