· Private foundation
The Anne and Charlie Joseph Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA | $95,000 |
| MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ARTS JACKSONVILLE | $25,200 |
| MALIVAI WASHINGTON YOUTH FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| VARIOUS OTHER CHARITIES UNDER 500 | $2,280 |
| DELORES BARR WEAVER POLICY CENTER | $2,000 |
| SHELBURNE FARMS | $2,000 |
| E4E RELIEF | $1,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| SAN MARCO CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY | $650 |
| PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK | $500 |
| CONGREGATION AHAVATH CHESED | $500 |
| CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECTS | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART JACKSONVILLE INC3× · 2019–2024 · $27k · revenue +200%
- JUJacksonville University3× · 2020–2023 · $11k · revenue +40%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- TLTHE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +42%
- MOMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART INCone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +11%
- JAJEWISH AND FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICESone grant, 2019 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mills Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds MaliVai Washington Kids Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART JACKSONVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville University ↗
- Who funds E4E RELIEF LLC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS ↗
- Who funds DBWPC INC ↗
- Who funds THE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPING ARTISTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAN MARCO CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PINE CASTLE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CIVIC ORCHESTRA OF JACKSONVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MILLS FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Dubow Family Foundation Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Winston Family Foundation · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Gasper & Irene Lazzara Charitable Foundation · VyStar Credit Union · The Haskell Foundation · The Maryellen S Willis Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Anne and Charlie Joseph Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dbwpc Inc — 10% of income from government
- Jacksonville University — 3% of income from government
- Shelburne Farms — 3% of income from government
- United Way of Northeast Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- Cathedral Arts Project Inc — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Pine Castle Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Anne and Charlie Joseph Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Anne and Charlie Joseph Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.