Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ann C and John a Henry III Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$172kArts & Culture$31kSocial Science$23kHealth$6kPublic Benefit$6kEmployment$4kEnvironment$1kPhilanthropy$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$500
Median grant
10
States reached
$708k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$20,500
SMU OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT BRIDWELL INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS$14,000
SMU OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT MEADOWS MUSEUM$5,000
INTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION$1,000
CATCH UP AND READ$1,000
NEEMA HURUMA FOUNDATION$750
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$500
LANDMARK COLLEGE$500
TOWN OF TUFTONBORO SCHOLARSHIP FUND$500
CASADY SCHOOL$500
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$500
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$500
WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY$500
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$500
THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LEARNING ALLY: $100 → 6%LEARNING ALLY: $200 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
MI
NY
IN
PA
NJ
VA
MD
NC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of The Ann C and John a Henry III Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Ann C and John a Henry III Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$149k · 24 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$149k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-1%

Still filing today

58%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    EdChoice Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $11k · revenue +44%
  • DH
    DALLAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $4k · revenue +912%
  • KB
    KATHERYNE B PAYNE EDUCATION CENTER
    4× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • DC
    DARTMOUTH COLLEGE VARIOUS ITEMS
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue -1%
  • GM
    GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
8
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
9
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
10
Long Island University

To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.

—
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heritage Hall School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Highland Park Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SMU OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT BRIDWELL INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS: $34,000 · OtherSMU OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT BRIDWELL INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICSSMU OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT MEADOWS MUSEUM: $25,000 · OtherSMU OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT MEADOWS MUSEUMSMU OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT BRIDWEL INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS: $20,000 · OtherSMU OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT BRIDWEL INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICSDARTMOUTH COLLEGE COLIN AND ROSEMARY CAMPBELL FUND: $20,000 · OtherDARTMOUTH COLLEGE COLIN AND ROSEMARY CAMPBELL FUNDDARTMOUTH COLLEGE VARIOUS ITEMS: $7,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 · Other+17 more: $27,100 · Other+17 moreTrustees of Dartmouth College: $65,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeEdChoice Inc: $11,000 · EducationEdChoice IncHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $9,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE+10 more: $10,100 · Education+10 moreDALLAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $4,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $4,000 · Public Safety & DisasterLeadership Institute: $1,500 · Public BenefitGRANITE STATE ADAPTIVE: $500 · Youth DevelopmentLearning Ally Inc: $300 · Human ServicesINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $200 · Health
Other$138,600Education$95,100Arts & Culture$4,000Public Safety & Disaster$4,000Public Benefit$1,500Youth Development$500Human Services$300Health$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEdChoice Inc: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKATHERYNE B PAYNE EDUCATION CENTER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLANDMARK COLLEGE INC: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC: $1,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA INC: $1,350 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS DISCOVERY GARDENS: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATCH UP & READ INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMY POSSIBILITIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGHLAND PARK LIBRARY: $800 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe Neema-Huruma Foundation Inc: $750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGRANITE STATE ADAPTIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENHILL SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKILDONAN SCHOOL: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds EdChoice Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds KATHERYNE B PAYNE EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
  • Who funds LANDMARK COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY SCHOOLS OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS DISCOVERY GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CATCH UP & READ INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds MY POSSIBILITIES ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HIGHLAND PARK LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds The Neema-Huruma Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRANITE STATE ADAPTIVE ↗
  • Who funds GREENHILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KILDONAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inasmuch FoundationOK15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inasmuch Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Vose Foundation Inc · Fred Jones Family Foundation · The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ann C and John a Henry III Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ann C and John a Henry III Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Landmark College Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ann C and John a Henry III’s filings →

More from the funding graph