· Private foundation
The Angelson Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $482k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INNOCENTS PROJECT NEW ORLEANS | $104,700 |
| RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION | $100,000 |
| CLASSIC STAGE COMPANY | $77,000 |
| COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS | $50,000 |
| NYU LANGONE HEALTH | $50,000 |
| PECONIC COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| DORMITION OF THE VIRGIN MARY | $15,000 |
| EASTERN LONG ISLAND HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| JAMIE AND PAIGE MALONE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA | $10,000 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST | $10,000 |
| FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT HOMELAND SECURITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BUSHWICK STARR | $5,000 |
| CHOP 4 CHANGE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCSC REPERTORY LTD D/B/A CLASSIC STAGE COMPANY5× · 2020–2024 · $346k · revenue +27%
- COCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +21%
- IPINNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS2× · 2023–2024 · $145k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- 2S2 SIXTY SECOND STREET FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $50k
- NSNATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11TH MEMORIAL AND MUSEUMone grant, 2020 · $25k
- BFBUONECONTI FUNDone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…
Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…
Mtc's work includes producing and developing new work on and off-broadway, nurturing artists throughout their careers, and positively impacting the lives of many through innovative education programs. we are committed to equity, diversity…
The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…
The new group is an artist-driven company with a commitment to developing and producing powerful, contemporary theater. while constantly evolving, we maintain an ensemble approach to all our work and an articulated style of emotional…
Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The irish repertory theatre (the "theatre") mission is to bring works by irish and irish american masters and contemporary playwrights to american audiences, to provide a context for understanding the contemporary irish american experience…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
To produce bold theatre experiences that reach across artistic, physical and social boundries. We aim to increase empathy and open-mindedness by illuminating nuanced perspectives and unspoken truths behind the salient issues of our time.…
To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful through excellent audio programming that is deeply rooted in new york.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Lgbtq Task Force and the most unlike its peers is Federal Enforcement Homeland Security Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds CSC REPERTORY LTD D/B/A CLASSIC STAGE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INNOCENCE PROJECT NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds THE DRUMTHWACKET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PECONIC COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST ↗
- Who funds Federal Enforcement Homeland Security Foundation ↗
- Who funds SYLVESTER MANOR EDUCATIONAL FARM INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EXECUTIVE SERVICE CORPS ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds EASTERN LONG ISLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds The Jamie and Paige Malone Foundation ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds JusticeAid ↗
- Who funds COLORADO NEW PLAY FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds THE JOSEPH FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BUSHWICK STARR INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Mutual of America Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Axe-Houghton Foundation · The Macmillan Family Foundation Inc · The Shubert Foundation Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Angelson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Angelson Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Angelson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.