Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Angel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$925k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$2.8MMembership Benefit$875kReligion$205kScience & Tech$75kYouth Development$38kInternational$37kHealth$37kArts & Culture$37kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
$7,800
Median grant
8
States reached
$24M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position — about 93% of reported assets are held in Linde Plc Com Euro0 01.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$925,000
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY$600,000
SPACE FOR HUMANITY$50,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$25,000
LA LUZ EDUCATION$25,000
CAROLINA CHRISTIAN RADIO INC$20,000
VILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$15,000
HUTS FOR VETS$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
NORTH TEXAS GIVING DAY$7,800
CFWNCORG$5,155
TRAVELERS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA$5,000
CROSSNORE SCHOOL$5,000
MANNA FOOD BANK$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $2k → 14%HUTS FOR VETS: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 9 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
63

Total granted

$3.0M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +364%
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2024 · $910k · revenue +24%
  • SF
    SPACE FOR HUMANITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • NS
    NC STATE TREASURER NCSU EFT CLEARING ACCOUNT
    one grant, 2023 · $875k
  • WH
    WALNUT HILL COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
3
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
4
North Greenville University

North greenville university exists to glorify god by cultivating graduates who are equipped to serve as transformational leaders for church and society.

Education
5
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
9
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
12
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Compassionate Life Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Missionary Organi…Independent K-8 SchoolsVeteran Support ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsYouth Development CentersFood Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support OrganizationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Public University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%58%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/59
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,506

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/53
Grantees still filing
40/53
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,850,000 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $910,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY+9 more — $75,668 · EducationNC STATE TREASURER NCSU EFT CLEARING ACCOUNT — $875,000 · OtherNC STATE TREASURER NCSU EFT CLEA…WALNUT HILL COMMUNITY CHURCH — $60,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $50,000 · Other+61 more — $225,783 · Other+61 moreSPACE FOR HUMANITY — $75,000 · Science & TechCAROLINA CHRISTIAN RADIO INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $5,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $3,000 · Arts & CultureSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $35,000 · ReligionDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $17,000 · Human ServicesHuts for Vets — $10,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesSPIRIT OF CHARITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Philanthropy
Education$2,835,668Other$1,210,783Science & Tech$75,000Arts & Culture$73,000Religion$35,000Human Services$28,000Philanthropy$27,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,850,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $910,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPACE FOR HUMANITY — $75,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetCAROLINA CHRISTIAN RADIO INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLa Luz Education — $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPIRIT OF CHARITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGood Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern North Carolina Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHuts for Vets — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Newport County Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology — $6,668 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE — $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Carolina Barbecue Society — $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGORDON COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPennys Flight Foundation Inc — $2,077 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND — $1,543 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetV O C A L - NEW HANOVER COUNTY INC — $1,500 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetUPLIFTING ATHLETES INC — $1,120 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE LIFE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTamassee DAR School Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGEFIELD POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE REPERTORY THEATRE OF ST LOUIS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERRY COLLEGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN OAKS EDUCATION AND SUPPORT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE COUNSELING SERVICES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHillside School Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX16.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Angel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Angel Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Angel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph