Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Andrew M Heller Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.4MEducation$480kArts & Culture$270kYouth Development$160kHuman Services$120kAnimals$94kHealth$42kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.4M
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELLER DONOR ADVISED FUND$2,381,232
NSU ART MUSEUM FT LAUDERDALE$39,700
BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION$27,510
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$25,000
WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD$2,500
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$1,000
SAVANNAH COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN$1,000
BROWARD COUNTY FILM SOCIETY$1,000
THE GIVING SPIRIT$500
RANGER GOOD WORKS INC$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE GIVING SPIRIT: $500 → 14%THE GIVING SPIRIT: $500 → 14%THE GIVING SPIRIT: $500 → 14%THE GIVING SPIRIT: $500 → 14%THE GIVING SPIRIT: $500 → 14%THE GIVING SPIRIT: $500 → 14%JACK & JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $42k → 13%JACK & JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $22k → 13%JACK & JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $21k → 13%JACK & JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $21k → 13%JACK & JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 13%JACK & JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$846k · 16 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$846k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-16%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +40%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $150k · revenue +26%
  • JA
    JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $109k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SANSON FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -87% · 26% of their budget
  • PB
    PEBBLE BEACH COMPANY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • TS
    THE SPIRIT AIRLINES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Barry University Inc

Barry university is a catholic institution of higher education founded by the adrian dominican sisters. with a liberal arts tradition, barry university is a scholarly community committed to the highest academic standards in undergraduate,…

Education
5
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
6
Universidad Del Sagrado Corazon Inc

The universidad del sagrado corazon (sagrado) is an independent, nonprofit, catholic university, committed to the education of the whole person through strong foundation in the liberal arts. sagrado is part of puerto ricos oldest private,…

Education
7
Robert Rauschenberg Foundation
Arts & Culture
8
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
9
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
10
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
11
Moore College of Art and Design

Moore is dedicated to excellence in art and design. Founded in 1848, Moore is the first and only visual arts college for women in the US. With its undergraduate BFA degree for women and coeducational graduate programs, Moore cultivates…

Education
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Broward Performing Arts Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Spirit Airlines Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HELLER DONOR ADVISED FUND: $2,381,232 · OtherHELLER DONOR ADVISED FUNDNSU ART MUSEUM FT LAUDERDALE: $125,200 · OtherBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $106,760 · Other+10 more: $148,955 · Other+10 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $300,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE…WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $170,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVER…+1 more: $9,017 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentJACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $108,600 · Human Services+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE SANSON FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · AnimalsABANDONED PET RESCUE INC: $11,000 · AnimalsPETS BROWARD INC: $2,750 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $16,595 · HealthNorthwestern University: $9,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,762,147Education$479,017Youth Development$150,000Human Services$111,600Animals$39,750Health$16,595Recreation & Sports$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $300,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $170,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $150,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetJACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $108,600 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $106,760 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SANSON FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $16,595 over 3y, 11% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $9,017 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING SPIRIT: $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPETS BROWARD INC: $2,750 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE BROWARD COUNTY OF FILM SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL AID INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRanger Good Works Inc: $700 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JACK AND JILL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SANSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ABANDONED PET RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Savannah College of Art and DesignInc ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds PETS BROWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPIRIT AIRLINES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG AT ART OF BROWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BROWARD COUNTY OF FILM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL AID INC ↗
  • Who funds Ranger Good Works Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Broward IncFL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Broward Inc · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Andrew M Heller Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Andrew M Heller Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jack and Jill Children's Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Andrew M Heller Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Andrew M Heller Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Andrew M Heller Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph