Skip to content
The Amlicke Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Amlicke Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$260kEducation$37kEnvironment$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kPhilanthropy$29kHuman Services$21kFood & Nutrition$13kAnimals$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAMMER RESIDENCES INC$25,000
CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGY$10,000
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$5,000
GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC$5,000
ALTON COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM INC$4,000
NATIONAL ALOPECIA AREATA FOUNDATION$1,000
SEACOAST REPERTORY THEATRE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $25k → 11%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $10k → 9%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $20k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $20k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $5k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $20k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $15k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $15k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $10k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $10k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
NY
IN
PA
CT
RI
CA
VA
AZ
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Amlicke Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Amlicke Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$311k · 8 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$311k
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+19%

Still filing today

88%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HR
    Hammer Residences Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +63%
  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $85k · revenue +7%
  • EB
    Empowered by Light
    2× · 2017–2018 · $25k · revenue +249%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NAVAJO NATION
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • CC
    COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -19%
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
3
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
4
Robert a Toigo Foundation

Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.

Education
5
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
8
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
11
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
12
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hammer Residences Inc: $145,000 · Human ServicesHammer Residences IncBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $85,000 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATIO…NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $11,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR…PERSON TO PERSON INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyTHE NAVAJO NATION: $15,000 · OtherTHE NAVAJO NATIONCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $15,000 · OtherCOTA - Children's Or…CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGY: $12,000 · OtherCORNELL LABORATORY O…FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHWESTPORT BOARD OF EDUCATION: $5,000 · OtherWESTPORT BOARD OF ED…GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 · OtherGALAPAGOS CONSERVANC…THE ALTON COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $4,000 · OtherJACQUES PEPIN FOUNDATION THE: $9,000 · OtherJACQUES PEPIN FOUNDA…+5 more: $5,500 · Other+5 moreEmpowered by Light: $25,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalSTAPLES HIGH SCHOOL TUITION GRANTS COMMITTEE INC: $16,000 · EducationWESTPORT LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationNEW VENTURE FUND: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,500 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 · HealthFAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA: $2,000 · HealthNational Alopecia Areata Foundation: $1,000 · Health
Human Services$170,000Philanthropy$103,500Other$80,500International$36,000Education$36,000Environment$15,000Health$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHammer Residences Inc: $145,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEmpowered by Light: $25,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTAPLES HIGH SCHOOL TUITION GRANTS COMMITTEE INC: $16,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTPORT LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACQUES PEPIN FOUNDATION THE: $9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALTON COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $4,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DENISE D'ASCENZO FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNational Alopecia Areata Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKANKSHA EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable F…The Goldman Sachs Cha…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Amlicke Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Amlicke Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Person to Person Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Amlicke Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home