Skip to content
The Amity Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Amity Foundation

Public service and education

$960k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

International$803kYouth Development$105kPhilanthropy$70kReligion$56kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kPublic Benefit$2k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $132,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $959,549 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $827,549 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $117k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$48,000
LIFEBLOOD$44,000
PALESTINE CHILDRENS RELIEF FUND$15,000
DEVELOPMENT RELIEF FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION$5,000
HEAL PALESTINE$5,000
HADI INSTITUTE$2,000
THE MAINSTAY FOUNDATION$1,500
MECCA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNITED HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $12k → 21%UNITED HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$549k · 5 repeat orgs$499k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$549k
$394k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

100%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
InternationalPublic Safety & DisasterReligionFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $225k · revenue +786%
  • PA
    PALESTINIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $162k · revenue ×12
  • TF
    TAHA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $105k · revenue -40%

Funded once

  • RW
    RAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $290k · revenue 0%
  • BC
    BANIN CHARITY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $70k
  • YC
    YEMEN CRISES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Physicians for Palestine
Health
2
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
4
Amin Arasteh Foundation
—
5
Zakah Aid and Charity Assisting Humanity

Zakat, aid and charity assisting humanity (zacah) is a minnesota-based grassroots organization dedicated to the collection and re-distribution of wealth, including zakat (mandatory charitable tax for all muslims) and sadaqah (any…

Religion
6
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
7
International Humanitarian Relief

To provide full educational and learning opportuintes to displaced refugees. ihr-usa operates learning centers that teach children basic math, english and science classes. in addition we help in their everyday lives such as food, shelter…

International
8
Al Hurvisadamm Education Foundation
Education
9
Zahra Foundation Ltd

Zahra foundation provides humartian aid to the destiute orphans of iraq and people suffering extreme circumstances around the world

International
10
The Hassan Foundation

To promote human development by preserving life through improving health and education amongst the poor people in pakistan. to provide clean potable water, support and education for orphans and homeless

International
11
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
12
Albayan Academy

Educating muslim generations for a brighter future of the humanity, gene- rations of faith and knowledge. we believe in worshiping the almighty, serving our muslim communities, and partnering with all diversified communities at large,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heal Palestine Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Kbk Relief Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT: $290,000 · InternationalRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENTPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $225,000 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUNDPALESTINIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $162,000 · InternationalPALESTINIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONHEAL PALESTINE INC: $40,000 · InternationalHEAL PALESTINE INCBANIN CHARITY ASSOCIATION: $70,000 · OtherBANIN CHARITY ASSOC…ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $48,000 · OtherISLAMIC INSTITUTE O…LIFE BLOOD FOUNDATION: $44,000 · OtherLIFE BLOOD FOUNDATI…YEMEN CRISES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · OtherYEMEN CRISES FOUNDA…+1 more: $6,000 · OtherTAHA FOUNDATION: $105,000 · EducationTAHA FOUNDA…DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterUNITED HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $16,500 · Human ServicesTHE KBK RELIEF FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Food & NutritionMUSLIM EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER OF AMERICA: $1,500 · ReligionASSOCIATION OF SPIRITUAL RENEWAL: $600 · ReligionTHE MAINSTAY FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Public Benefit
International$717,000Other$183,000Education$105,000Public Safety & Disaster$20,000Human Services$16,500Food & Nutrition$2,500Religion$2,100Public Benefit$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT: $290,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $225,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPALESTINIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $162,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetTAHA FOUNDATION: $105,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetHEAL PALESTINE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $16,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetDEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE KBK RELIEF FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SPIRITUAL RENEWAL: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giv…Renaissance Charitabl…Network for GoodThe Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC9.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Amity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Amity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Amity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home