· Public charity
The Amity Foundation
Public service and education
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $132,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $959,549 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $827,549 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $117k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF AMERICA | $48,000 |
| LIFEBLOOD | $44,000 |
| PALESTINE CHILDRENS RELIEF FUND | $15,000 |
| DEVELOPMENT RELIEF FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HEAL PALESTINE | $5,000 |
| UNITED HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| HADI INSTITUTE | $2,000 |
| THE MAINSTAY FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| MECCA | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND4× · 2022–2025 · $225k · revenue +786%
- PAPALESTINIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION4× · 2022–2025 · $162k · revenue ×12
- TFTAHA FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $105k · revenue -40%
Funded once
- RWRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2024 · $290k · revenue 0%
- BCBANIN CHARITY ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2024 · $70k
- YCYEMEN CRISES FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.
Zakat, aid and charity assisting humanity (zacah) is a minnesota-based grassroots organization dedicated to the collection and re-distribution of wealth, including zakat (mandatory charitable tax for all muslims) and sadaqah (any…
To provide full educational and learning opportuintes to displaced refugees. ihr-usa operates learning centers that teach children basic math, english and science classes. in addition we help in their everyday lives such as food, shelter…
Zahra foundation provides humartian aid to the destiute orphans of iraq and people suffering extreme circumstances around the world
To promote human development by preserving life through improving health and education amongst the poor people in pakistan. to provide clean potable water, support and education for orphans and homeless
Educating muslim generations for a brighter future of the humanity, gene- rations of faith and knowledge. we believe in worshiping the almighty, serving our muslim communities, and partnering with all diversified communities at large,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heal Palestine Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Kbk Relief Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds PALESTINIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TAHA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEAL PALESTINE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE KBK RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MAINSTAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF SPIRITUAL RENEWAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Amity Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.