Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Alsop Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$419kEducation$84kYouth Development$11kPhilanthropy$9kCrime & Legal$3kEmployment$3kReligion$3kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TAKI ALSOP CONDUCTING FELLOWSHIP$40,000
PEABODY INSTITUTE OF JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV$5,000
ORCHKIDS$5,000
BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$4,300
THE MASTERS SCHOOL$3,500
BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
EUGENE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION$1,000
LEAGUE OF AMERICAN ORCHESTRAS$500
INTERSECTION$250
INTERNATIONAL CONDUCTORS GUILD$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE MARIAN HOUSE: $250 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OR
NV
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$479k · 35 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
18

Total granted

$479k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+42%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalHealthEmploymentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TAKI ALSOP CONDUCTING FELLOWSHIP INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $190k · revenue +113%
  • BS
    BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +68%
  • MS
    MASTERS SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • TC
    TAKI CONCORDIA CONDUCTING FELLOWSHI
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baltimore Chamber Orchestra Inc

The mission of the baltimore chamber orchestra is to move, inspire, and provide educational opportunities to baltimore's community through world-class performances.

Arts & Culture
2
Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

Arts & Culture
3
Baltimore Concert Opera Inc

Opera baltimore creates a thrilling, meaningful shared experience between our audience and our artists. our streamlined format focuses on the primary element of opera: the unamplified human voice. featuring top flight professional opera…

Arts & Culture
4
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
5
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
6
Baltimore Choral Arts Society Inc

The society was created to support a chorus, which performs public concerts of choral & orchestra music. the mission is to build a stronger, more connected, more inspired community by celebrating the joy of choral music through exceptional…

Arts & Culture
7
Concerto Soloists Chamber Orchestra of Philadelphia

To be a sustainable musical institution that brings the intimate experience of a world-class chamber orchestra performance to the greater philadelphia area,enriching the musical life of the city and region by the integrity and excellence…

Arts & Culture
8
The Richmond Symphony

The richmond symphony performs, teaches and champions music to inspire and unite our communities.

Arts & Culture
9
Hawaii Symphony Orchestra

To present the highest-quality performances of great music, bringing national and international distinction to the orchestra and its community; to delight and educate audiences of all ages and backgrounds, and enhance the cultural vitality…

Arts & Culture
10
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
11
Chamber Music Pittsburgh

To present world class chamber music ensembles and soloists, promising emerging artists, and innovative programs; and to foster an appreciation for chamber music in the pittsburgh community by offering educational programs and experiences.

Arts & Culture
12
Binghamton Philharmonic Inc

The mission of the Binghamton Philharmonic is building community through the power of live music.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc and the most unlike its peers is Masters School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyClassical Music EnsemblesCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Elementary Literacy TutoringGovernment Accountability R…Hospice Care ServicesLgbtq+ Community CentersCommunity Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr16%11%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%59%20–35yr11%11%35–55yr16%28%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,820

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE TAKI ALSOP CONDUCTING FELLOWSHIP INC — $189,900 · Arts & CultureTHE TAKI ALSOP CONDUCTING FELLOWSHIP INCBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $54,300 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC+12 more — $17,400 · Arts & Culture+12 moreTAKI CONCORDIA CONDUCTING FELLOWSHIP — $62,100 · OtherTAKI CONCORDIA CONDUCTING FELLOWSHIPORCHKIDS — $30,000 · OtherORCHKIDSMASTERS SCHOOL — $27,000 · OtherMASTERS SCHOOLTAKI CONCORDIA CONDUCTING FELLOWSHI — $16,000 · OtherTAKI CONCORDIA CONDUCTING FELLOWSHIPEABODY INSTITUTE OF JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV — $12,796 · OtherPEABODY INSTITUTE OF JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherPEABODY INSTITUTE JOHNS HOPKINS — $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $8,000 · Other+23 more — $51,050 · Other+23 moreThe New School — $20,000 · EducationGILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $3,000 · Education+2 more — $350 · EducationBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $9,215 · PhilanthropyFREESTATE JUSTICE INC — $2,750 · Crime & LegalMARYLAND NEW DIRECTIONS INC — $2,000 · HealthClimate Access Fund Corporation — $1,000 · Environment
Arts & Culture$261,600Other$235,446Education$23,350Philanthropy$9,215Crime & Legal$2,750Health$2,000Environment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TAKI ALSOP CONDUCTING FELLOWSHIP INC — $189,900 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $54,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMASTERS SCHOOL — $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe New School — $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $9,215 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEugene Symphony Association Inc — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFREESTATE JUSTICE INC — $2,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC — $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERSECTION — $2,250 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMARYLAND NEW DIRECTIONS INC — $2,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHARTFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE PUBLIC MEDIA CORPORATION — $1,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGEBOUND FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetClimate Access Fund Corporation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN NECK ORCHESTRA CORPORATION — $750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW MUSIC USA INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER STAGE ASSOCIATES INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENDERSON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CONDUCTORS GUILD INC — $500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCREATIVE ALLIANCE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST BOOK — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN HOUSE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TAKI ALSOP CONDUCTING FELLOWSHIP INC
  • Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds MASTERS SCHOOL
  • Who funds The New School
  • Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Eugene Symphony Association Inc
  • Who funds GILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED
  • Who funds FREESTATE JUSTICE INC
  • Who funds GILCHRIST HOSPICE CARE INC
  • Who funds INTERSECTION
  • Who funds MARYLAND NEW DIRECTIONS INC
  • Who funds HARTFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds BALTIMORE PUBLIC MEDIA CORPORATION
  • Who funds COLLEGEBOUND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds Climate Access Fund Corporation
  • Who funds NORTHERN NECK ORCHESTRA CORPORATION
  • Who funds NEW MUSIC USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Abell Foundation IncMD23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Abell Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Patricia and Mark Joseph Shelter Foundation Inc · The Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Joseph Meyerhoff Fund Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Alsop Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc11% of income from government
  • Maryland New Directions Inc8% of income from government
  • Center Stage Associates Inc7% of income from government
  • The American Visionary Art Museum Inc6% of income from government
  • Baltimore Museum of Art4% of income from government
  • Eugene Symphony Association Inc2% of income from government
  • Marian House Inc2% of income from government
  • Hartford Symphony Orchestra Inc0% of income from government
  • Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Alsop Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Alsop Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph