Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Alsam Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$17M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$92MHealth$50MReligion$23MScience & Tech$9.8MEnvironment$8.5MAnimals$8.5MHousing & Shelter$4.2MRecreation & Sports$2.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $392k
  • $250k+16 grants · $49M
$750,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SKAGGS CATHOLIC CENTER LLC$16,650,237
THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSITUTE$10,000,000
JUDGE MEMORIAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$7,500,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$4,750,000
FRIENDS OF ZOO BOISE$2,000,000
IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,500,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000,000
THE LIVING PLANET$892,729
SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SCHOOL$855,800
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA$750,000
SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY$750,000
SAINT ANDREW CATHOLIC SCHOOL$516,724
SAINT FRANCIS XAVIER SCHOOL$490,260
SAINT OLAF SCHOOL$429,177
WASATCH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE$300,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $1.0M → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $1.0M → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $100k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $100k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $100k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $22k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
CA
UT
CO
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$160M · 33 repeat orgs$53M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
26

Total granted

$160M
$49M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+30%

Still filing today

24%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $37M · revenue +19%
  • TL
    THE LIVING PLANET INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $6.5M · revenue +92%
  • IY
    IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2.0M · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • IS
    IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $14M
  • MD
    MATER DEI CATHOLIC HIGH
    one grant, 2020 · $5.2M
  • WU
    WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $5.0M · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
University of Western States

The mission of the University of Western States is to advance the science and art of integrated health care through excellence in education and patient care.

Health
4
Northwestern Health Sciences University

Northwestern health sciences university prepares and serves the next generation of professionals and leaders to become vital contributors to the delivery and advancement of health care. our mission is accomplished through educational…

Education
5
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
6
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
7
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
Institute for Systems Biology

Non-profit research institute to advance a systems (or holistic and cross-disciplinary) approach to science; personalized medicine; global health & environmental sustainability; science education; & the pioneering & invention of biological…

Science & Tech
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
12
Utah Public Health Association

The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holy Cross Ministries of Utah; the most unlike its peers is North Carolina State. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $24,150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHSKAGGS CATHOLIC CENTER LLC: $21,039,333 · OtherSKAGGS CATHOLIC CENTER LLCIDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY: $14,000,000 · OtherIDAHO STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $12,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADOUNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $8,750,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MONTANAJUDGE MEMORIAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $7,633,119 · OtherTHE LIVING PLANET INC: $6,492,729 · OtherTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH: $6,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,657,300 · Other+39 more: $52,402,004 · Other+39 moreTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $36,635,331 · HealthTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH I…SCRIPPS HEALTH: $4,501,869 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTH+2 more: $750,000 · HealthWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $5,000,000 · EducationIdaho State University Foundation Inc: $1,500,000 · EducationBILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $300,000 · EducationWASATCH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE: $300,000 · EducationIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $2,000,000 · Human ServicesNeighborhood House Association: $222,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN: $100,000 · Human ServicesDucks Unlimited Inc: $2,000,000 · EnvironmentIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $700,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY: $645,000 · Animals+1 more: $10,000 · AnimalsNORTH CAROLINA STATE: $500,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$158,124,485Health$41,887,200Education$7,100,000Human Services$2,322,000Environment$2,000,000Food & Nutrition$700,000Animals$655,000Recreation & Sports$500,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $36,635,331 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTHE LIVING PLANET INC: $6,492,729 over 3y, 19% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $5,000,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $4,501,869 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $4,125,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $2,000,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $2,000,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetIdaho State University Foundation Inc: $1,500,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC: $1,200,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $700,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY: $645,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetWasatch Homeless Health Care: $500,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHoly Cross Ministries of Utah: $250,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $222,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAPTORS OF THE ROCKIES: $10,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE LIVING PLANET INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds Idaho State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA STATE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McCarthey Family FoundationUT17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McCarthey Family Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Making a Difference Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Alsam Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Alsam Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Alsam Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Alsam Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alsam’s filings →

    More from the funding graph