Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Aldarra Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$51M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$138MHealth$73MAnimals$10.0MHuman Services$9.3MEducation$8.2MEnvironment$5.8MPublic Safety & Disaster$5.5MHousing & Shelter$5.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,175,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$946k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION$51,000,000
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$26,000,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH$2,200,000
CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA$2,200,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$2,200,000
ARBORETUM FOUNDATION$2,200,000
MARYS PLACE SEATTLE$2,175,000
MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION$2,175,000
SEATTLE'S UNION GOSPEL MISSION$2,150,000
UW FOUNDATION$1,900,000
TREEHOUSE$1,800,000
HOPELINK$1,800,000
PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN$1,600,000
NORTHWEST SCHOOL FOR DEAF AND HARD-OF-HEARING CHILDREN$600,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $9.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $2.2M → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $865k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $650k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $500k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $421k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $300k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $100k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $100k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $52k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $20k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $10k → 9%HOPELINK: $1.8M → 9%HOPELINK: $1.6M → 9%HOPELINK: $921k → 9%HOPELINK: $333k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$260M · 16 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +72% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
13

Total granted

$260M
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+72%

Still filing today

75%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $133M · revenue +176% · 67% of their budget
  • ARBORETUM FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.8M · revenue +552% · 54% of their budget
  • MO
    MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.5M · revenue +46% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • BS
    BERTSCHI SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +72%
  • NB
    NEW BEGINNINGS SHELTER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • TN
    THE NOAH CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
2
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
3
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
4
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
5
School's Out Washington

School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.

Youth Development
6
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

—
7
Bloodworks

Saving lives through research, innovation, education and excellence in blood, medical and laboratory services in partnership with our community.

Health
8
Pacific Science Center Foundation

Pacific science center (pacsci) ignites curiosity in every child and fuels a passion for discovery, experimentation, and critical thinking in all of us.

Arts & Culture
9
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Friends of Kexp

Kexp's mission is to enrich your life by championing music and discovery.

Youth Development
12
Uw Physicians Network

To improve the health of the public.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cascade Public Media; the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
18/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION: $132,883,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATIONCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $5,310,545 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $67,858,000 · OtherSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $5,268,200 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CE…SEATTLES UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $5,071,000 · OtherSEATTLES UNION GOSPEL MISSION+8 more: $1,860,000 · OtherCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $5,217,045 · Human ServicesMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $5,114,545 · Human ServicesHOPELINK: $4,653,145 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $4,720,545 · EducationNorthwest School for Hearing-Impaired Children: $1,721,570 · Education+2 more: $30,500 · EducationARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $5,846,985 · EnvironmentMEDIC ONE FOUNDATION: $5,491,700 · Health+3 more: $15,000 · HealthPASADO'S SAFE HAVEN: $4,728,975 · AnimalsTREEHOUSE: $4,642,545 · Youth Development+1 more: $10,000 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$138,193,545Other$80,057,200Human Services$14,989,735Education$6,472,615Environment$5,846,985Health$5,506,700Animals$4,728,975Youth Development$4,652,545

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION: $132,883,000 over 7y, 67% of budgetARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $5,846,985 over 7y, 54% of budgetMEDIC ONE FOUNDATION: $5,491,700 over 7y, 40% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $5,310,545 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $5,268,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $5,217,045 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $5,114,545 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetPASADO'S SAFE HAVEN: $4,728,975 over 7y, 22% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $4,720,545 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHOPELINK: $4,653,145 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $4,642,545 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetNorthwest School for Hearing-Impaired Children: $1,721,570 over 5y, 15% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBERTSCHI SCHOOL: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARBORETUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPELINK ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Northwest School for Hearing-Impaired Children ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds BERTSCHI SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Maris Place ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · American Gift Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Aldarra Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Aldarra Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Aldarra Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Aldarra Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aldarra’s filings →

    More from the funding graph