Skip to content
The Albert J Rodenberg Sr & Ann Xonia at a glance

· Private foundation

The Albert J Rodenberg Sr & Ann Xonia

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Food & Nutrition$22kHuman Services$14kPublic Benefit$10kArts & Culture$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kEducation$5kHealth$5kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$900
Median grant
2
States reached
$68k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GODS LOVE WE DELIVER$6,000
KREUTER MEMORIAL FUND$1,500
IOBY$1,000
DEPUTY BILL BREWER 2055 FOUNDATION$900
THE ROBERT W WILSON MCC THEATER SPACE$500
BATAVIA ROTARY CLUB$500
NEWTOWN WINTERFEST$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW LIFE FURNITURE INC: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NV
OH
CA
KY
VA
MD
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35k · 6 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
27

Total granted

$35k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+30%

Still filing today

67%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $21k · revenue +66%
  • KM
    Kreuter Memorial Fund
    3× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +125%
  • CL
    CINCINNATI LANDMARK PRODUCTIONS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLERMONT COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • OPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Animal Cancer Foundation

Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…

Health
4
The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
5
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
6
The Kidney Cancer Association

The kidney cancer association is a global community dedicated to serving and empowering patients, and leading change through advocacy, research, and education in order to be the universal leader in finding the cure for kidney cancer.

Health
7
Cintrifuse

To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.

Community Improvement
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Bow Street Theatre Trust
—
10
Classical Theatre Company

Classical Theatre Company is dedicated to boldly re-envisioning classical drama on the stage, in the community, and in the classroom through engaging and enlightening plays that bring them new life and relevance while maintaining the…

Arts & Culture
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
12
Cincinnati Bar Foundation

Promoting justice and changing lives through the law with the desire to serve the legal profession, the justice system and the Greater Cincinnati community. The Cincinnati Bar Foundation concentrates grant-making efforts in the following…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Actors' Fund of America; the most unlike its peers is Kreuter Memorial Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLERMONT COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS: $10,000 · OtherCLERMONT COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONSIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDONALD KLEKAMP COMMUNITY LAW CENTER: $2,500 · OtherDONALD KLEKAMP COMMUNITY LAW CENTERTHE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE: $2,500 · OtherTHE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGEBATAVIA ROTARY CLUB: $1,500 · Other+17 more: $14,450 · Other+17 moreGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $21,000 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INCLA SOUPE INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyOPENCOLLECTI…NICK ERDY FOUNDATION INC: $500 · PhilanthropyDEPUTY BILL BREWER 2055 FOUNDATION: $5,100 · EducationDEPUTY BIL…Kreuter Memorial Fund: $3,500 · EducationKreuter Me…Know Theatre of Cincinnati: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI LANDMARK PRODUCTIONS: $3,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 · HealthZERO PROSTATE CANCER: $1,000 · HealthCASA FOR CLERMONT KIDS: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$40,950Food & Nutrition$22,000Philanthropy$10,500Education$8,600Arts & Culture$7,500Health$4,500Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEPUTY BILL BREWER 2055 FOUNDATION: $5,100 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetKreuter Memorial Fund: $3,500 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetCINCINNATI LANDMARK PRODUCTIONS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA FOR CLERMONT KIDS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRAY ANIMAL ADOPTION PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA SOUPE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZERO PROSTATE CANCER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE MANATEE LITERACY PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNICK ERDY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetNEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTraining Leaders International: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John a Schroth Family…The Greater Cincinnat…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
John a Schroth Family Char TrPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John a Schroth Family Char Tr · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Albert J Rodenberg Sr & Ann Xonia funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Albert J Rodenberg Sr & Ann Xonia. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Albert J Rodenberg Sr & Ann Xonia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home