Skip to content
The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$580k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$4.4MArts & Culture$646kYouth Development$447kHealth$392kHuman Services$272kPhilanthropy$125kPublic Benefit$30kScience & Tech$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $212k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $520k
  • $250k+1 grant · $580k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY$579,500
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEBERDAVIS$62,000
SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY$55,000
Individual grant recipient$52,500
MIDTOWN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$50,000
SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION$50,000
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$50,000
UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$50,000
UTAH FESTIVAL OPERA & MUSICAL THEATRE$30,000
OGDEN PIONEER DAYS FOUNDATION$28,000
ONSTAGE OGDEN$25,000
EGYPTIAN THEATRE FOUNDATION$25,000
PBS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $3k → 9%HOLDING OUT HELP: $1k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $2k → 8%OGDEN RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 9%OGDEN WEBER COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in UT; by stated purpose, 80%.

The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.5M · 54 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
20

Total granted

$6.5M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+23%

Still filing today

52%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $432k · revenue +124%
  • MC
    Midtown Community Health Center Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +23%
  • OO
    ONSTAGE OGDEN
    5× · 2019–2024 · $125k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • OC
    ORTHO CUP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • HC
    HUNTSMAN CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • BY
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
4
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
5
Ogden Family Foundation
Education
6
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
—
8
Utah Valley Operafest

Opera Education and Performance

—
9
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
10
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
11
The Utah Scholarship Foundation

To provide scholarships for Utah residents between the ages of 18 and 28 who have graduated from high school and are seeking additional educational opportunities.

Education
12
Utah Festival Opera Company

Elevating lives through ennobling artistic experiences by creating a nurturing environment that ensures performance excellence, creative experiences, and educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utahs First Lady Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
28/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,020,500 · OtherWEBER STATE UNIVERSITYUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $215,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $185,000 · OtherSOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY: $180,000 · Other+55 more: $1,495,400 · Other+55 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS: $432,400 · Youth Development+1 more: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentSNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $155,000 · EducationOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $119,200 · EducationWeber County School District Foundation: $80,500 · EducationDixie Technical College: $15,000 · EducationMidtown Community Health Center Inc: $300,000 · HealthSEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC: $37,500 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH: $125,000 · PhilanthropyYCC FOUNDATION: $66,050 · PhilanthropyOGDEN PIONEER DAYS FOUNDATION: $69,800 · Arts & CultureBALLET WEST: $50,000 · Arts & CultureECCLES COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $38,000 · Arts & CultureEGYPTIAN THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $3,500 · Arts & CultureFAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $16,500 · Human ServicesRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesAmerican Indian Services: $2,000 · Human ServicesHolding Out HELP: $1,000 · Human ServicesOGDEN-WEBER COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$5,095,900Youth Development$437,400Education$369,700Health$368,500Philanthropy$191,050Arts & Culture$186,300Human Services$29,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS: $432,400 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetMidtown Community Health Center Inc: $300,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetONSTAGE OGDEN: $125,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH: $125,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $119,200 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetWeber County School District Foundation: $80,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetOGDEN PIONEER DAYS FOUNDATION: $69,800 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetYCC FOUNDATION: $66,050 over 5y, 69% of budgetBALLET WEST: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTREEHOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $40,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetECCLES COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $38,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetSEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC: $37,500 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDavis Education Foundation: $26,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGOVERNORS MANSION FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetUNION STATION FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetWEBER HUMAN SERVICES FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $16,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetOGDEN - WEBER TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetGREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTR: $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAEROSPACE HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF UT: $8,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUTAHS FIRST LADY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENABLEUTAH INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOgden Friends of Acoustic Music-OFOAM: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Indian Services: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHolding Out HELP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOGDEN-WEBER COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW AMERICAN PHILHARMONIC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS ↗
  • Who funds Midtown Community Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SNOW COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ONSTAGE OGDEN ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH ↗
  • Who funds OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Weber County School District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OGDEN PIONEER DAYS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YCC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BALLET WEST ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ECCLES COMMUNITY ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Davis Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EGYPTIAN THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOVERNORS MANSION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNION STATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEBER HUMAN SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores …C Scott & Dorothy E W…Lawrence & Janet Dee …Sorenson Legacy Found…Larry H Miller and Ga…Beaver Creek Foundati…Nebeker Family Founda…Donnell B & Elizabeth…Ihc Health Services I…Pacificorp Foundation…The Community Foundat…Douglas & Shelley Fel…
George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT46.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Beaver Creek Foundation · Nebeker Family Foundation · Donnell B & Elizabeth D Stewart Education Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · The Community Foundation of Utah · Douglas & Shelley Felt Family Found

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alan and Jeanne Hall’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home