Skip to content
The Alabama Coalition Against Domestic Violence at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Alabama Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Create opportunities for freedom from domestic violence through advocacy, education, and the promotion of social intolerance of abuse.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$4.4MCrime & Legal$396kHousing & Shelter$254kPublic Safety & Disaster$116k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $1,037,047, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,079,621 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,574 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $871k
$79,413
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES$104,397
CRISIS SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA$102,402
FAMILY SUNSHINE CENTER$96,988
PENELOPE HOUSE$90,059
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER$83,688
TURNING POINT$82,131
HOUSE OF RUTH$79,525
SAFEPLACE$79,413
SAFEHOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY$77,575
YWCA OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$75,044
DAYBREAK INC$44,879
VICTIM SERVICES OF CULLMAN$33,416
2ND CHANCE INC$31,833
ASHAKIRAN INC$29,649
BALDWIN COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE$20,657
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASHAKIRAN INC: $30k → 11%BALDWIN COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE: $48k → 12%YWCA OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $75k → 16%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $104k → 17%ASHAKIRAN INC: $22k → 11%BALDWIN COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER: $48k → 12%YWCA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $65k → 16%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $63k → 17%ASHAKIRAN INC: $13k → 11%BALDWIN COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE: $45k → 12%YWCA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $64k → 16%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $44k → 17%BALDWIN COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE: $40k → 12%YWCA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $60k → 16%MCCADV: $41k → 17%BALDWIN COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE: $32k → 12%YWCA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $59k → 16%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $34k → 17%BALDWIN COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE: $28k → 12%YWCA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $48k → 16%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $20k → 17%BALDWIN COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE: $21k → 12%YWCA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $31k → 16%MCCADV: $16k → 17%YWCA-VSOC: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$5.2M
$0

Still filing today

94%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Crisis Services of North Alabama Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $519k · revenue +22%
  • PH
    PENELOPE HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $474k · revenue +26%
  • MA
    MONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $411k · revenue +21%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    S a F E Shelter

    We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

    —
    2
    Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

    Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

    Human Services
    3
    Family Crisis Shelter Inc

    To provide safe shelter, advocacy, counseling, referrals and support to all victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

    Civil Rights
    4
    Domestic Violence Shelter and Services Inc

    We will work toward the elimination of domestic violence and provide emergency and support services for survivors of domestic violence.For over 38 years, Domestic Violence Shelter and Services, Inc. (DVSS) has advanced its work to prevent…

    Human Services
    5
    Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

    Rape crisis and abuse shelter

    —
    6
    Family Crisis Shelter Inc

    Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse

    Human Services
    7
    Crisis Care Line

    Domestic violence victim services

    —
    8
    Crisis Control Center

    Provide on-going support services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. support includes a safe house & 24 hour phone line.

    Human Services
    9
    Domestic Abuse Council of Volusia County Inc

    Assist victims of domestic violence

    Human Services
    10
    A Safe Place

    Emergency shelter for victims of domestic violence.

    —
    11
    Women's and Children's Crisis Shelter

    Women's and children's crisis shelter is committed to providing safety, shelter and hope to victims of domestic violence.

    Human Services
    12
    Women's Alliance Inc

    Provide servies to victims of domestic violence, sexual assualt and homeless families.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 2ND Chance Inc; the most unlike its peers is AshaKiran Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    16/17
    Grantees still filing
    10/17
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    PENELOPE HOUSE INC: $474,372 · Human ServicesPENELOPE HOUSE INCMONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC: $410,788 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INCYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM: $403,962 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAMDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER I: $332,811 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER IDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $321,301 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICESBALDWIN FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER: $261,718 · Human ServicesBALDWIN FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTERSABRA SANCTUARY INC: $229,991 · Human ServicesSABRA SANCTUARY INCAshaKiran Inc: $119,686 · Human ServicesVictim Services of Cullman Inc: $114,454 · Human ServicesCrisis Services of North Alabama Inc: $519,361 · OtherCrisis Services of North Alabama IncSAFEPLACE INC: $377,835 · OtherSAFEPLACE INCTHE HOUSE OF RUTH INC: $339,774 · OtherTHE HOUSE OF RUTH INCTHE SAFEHOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY INC: $338,394 · OtherTHE SAFEHOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY INCSAN INC DBA TURNING POINT: $313,952 · OtherSAN INC DBA TURNING POINT2ND CHANCE INC: $253,664 · Other2ND CHANCE INCFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHWEST: $241,450 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHWESTCRISIS CENTER OF RUSSELL COUNTY: $116,408 · Public Safety & Disaster
    Human Services$2,669,083Other$2,384,430Public Safety & Disaster$116,408

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCrisis Services of North Alabama Inc: $519,361 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetPENELOPE HOUSE INC: $474,372 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetMONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC: $410,788 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM: $403,962 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSAFEPLACE INC: $377,835 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF RUTH INC: $339,774 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetTHE SAFEHOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY INC: $338,394 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER I: $332,811 over 8y, 11% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $321,301 over 8y, 19% of budgetSAN INC DBA TURNING POINT: $313,952 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetBALDWIN FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER: $261,718 over 8y, 5.5% of budget2ND CHANCE INC: $253,664 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHWEST: $241,450 over 8y, 12% of budgetSABRA SANCTUARY INC: $229,991 over 8y, 12% of budgetAshaKiran Inc: $119,686 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF RUSSELL COUNTY: $116,408 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetVictim Services of Cullman Inc: $114,454 over 4y, 12% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Crisis Services of North Alabama Inc ↗
    • Who funds PENELOPE HOUSE INC ↗
    • Who funds MONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC ↗
    • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM ↗
    • Who funds SAFEPLACE INC ↗
    • Who funds THE HOUSE OF RUTH INC ↗
    • Who funds THE SAFEHOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY INC ↗
    • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER I ↗
    • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES ↗
    • Who funds SAN INC DBA TURNING POINT ↗
    • Who funds BALDWIN FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
    • Who funds 2ND CHANCE INC ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHWEST ↗
    • Who funds SABRA SANCTUARY INC ↗
    • Who funds AshaKiran Inc ↗
    • Who funds CRISIS CENTER OF RUSSELL COUNTY ↗
    • Who funds Victim Services of Cullman Inc ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Alabama Coalition Aga…Mary Kay Ash Foundati…The Daniel Foundation…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
    Alabama Coalition Against Rape IncAL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Alabama Coalition Against Rape Inc · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Alabama Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Alabama Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
      typical government reliance, FY20–24
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Alabama Coalition Against Domestic Violence’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home