· Public charity
The Alabama Coalition Against Domestic Violence
Create opportunities for freedom from domestic violence through advocacy, education, and the promotion of social intolerance of abuse.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of THE ALABAMA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $1,037,047 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,079,621 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $42,574 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $871k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES | $104,397 |
| CRISIS SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA | $102,402 |
| FAMILY SUNSHINE CENTER | $96,988 |
| PENELOPE HOUSE | $90,059 |
| DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER | $83,688 |
| TURNING POINT | $82,131 |
| HOUSE OF RUTH | $79,525 |
| SAFEPLACE | $79,413 |
| SAFEHOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY | $77,575 |
| YWCA OF CENTRAL ALABAMA | $75,044 |
| DAYBREAK INC | $44,879 |
| VICTIM SERVICES OF CULLMAN | $33,416 |
| 2ND CHANCE INC | $31,833 |
| ASHAKIRAN INC | $29,649 |
| BALDWIN COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE | $20,657 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCrisis Services of North Alabama Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $519k · revenue +22%
- PHPENELOPE HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $474k · revenue +26%
- MAMONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC8× · 2017–2024 · $411k · revenue +21%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…
Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.
To provide safe shelter, advocacy, counseling, referrals and support to all victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.
We will work toward the elimination of domestic violence and provide emergency and support services for survivors of domestic violence.For over 38 years, Domestic Violence Shelter and Services, Inc. (DVSS) has advanced its work to prevent…
Rape crisis and abuse shelter
Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse
Domestic violence victim services
Provide on-going support services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. support includes a safe house & 24 hour phone line.
Assist victims of domestic violence
Emergency shelter for victims of domestic violence.
Women's and children's crisis shelter is committed to providing safety, shelter and hope to victims of domestic violence.
Provide servies to victims of domestic violence, sexual assualt and homeless families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 2ND Chance Inc and the most unlike its peers is AshaKiran Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Crisis Services of North Alabama Inc ↗
- Who funds PENELOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM ↗
- Who funds SAFEPLACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE OF RUTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAFEHOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER I ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SAN INC DBA TURNING POINT ↗
- Who funds BALDWIN FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds 2ND CHANCE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds SABRA SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds AshaKiran Inc ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CENTER OF RUSSELL COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Victim Services of Cullman Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alabama Coalition Against Rape Inc · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Alabama Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.