Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Al-Azem Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$166kArts & Culture$55kInternational$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kReligion$13kHealth$8kHuman Services$3kPhilanthropy$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $119k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION$49,000
WHITE HELMETS INC$25,000
SYRIAN AMERICAN COUNCEL$25,000
UMMA$20,000
SUNRISE$4,000
MEDGLOBAL$3,000
MUSLIM FAMILY SERVICES$2,000
SWASIA CHARITY$1,000
MERCY WITHOUT LIMIT$1,000
FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ASSOC$60
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SYRIAN AMERICAN COUNCEL: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
NJ
VA
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$350k · 10 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$350k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+35%

Still filing today

30%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BEVERLY HILLS ACADEMY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $164k · revenue +47%
  • SA
    SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $56k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2020 · $32k

Funded once

  • IH
    INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN RELIEF
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • S
    SAMS
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • TI
    TULEDO ISLAMI SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sema Us Inc

We provides medical assistance in disaster-affected and underserved areas, supports refugees, supplies experts for relief efforts, promotes medical education, and collaborates with similar NGOs globally.

Health
2
Multifaith Alliance Inc

Multifaith Alliance Incorporated's purpose is to harness the collective power of faith-based and secular partners to build on the strength and resilience of the Syrian people, help them restore their lives, and plant the seeds for a more…

International
3
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
4
Humanity Increased

Humanity-Increased is an international charity whose mission is to help those in need and promote human transformation. The teachings of Islam inspire our mission, and we strive to embody its values of compassion, empathy, and service to…

International
5
Strategic Global Response

Strategic Global Response effectively and efficiently delivers life-saving care to people affected by humanitarian crises, in the most challenging situations on earth

Human Services
6
Amel Foundation Inc

Amel Foundation is most focused on addressing the dire situation caused by the war in Sudan and the need of Nine Million people who have been displaced as a result of the war, by providing them with food, shelter , water, and medical…

Human Services
7
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
8
Rise Up Humanity

To provide humanitarian aid relief and support to refugees and individuals displaced by war conflict and natural disasters worldwide. In 2025 we were a fiscal sponsor for multiple projects helping refugees residing in Egypt.

International
9
Syrian American Medical Society Foundation

We are dedicated to delivering life-saving services, revitalizing health systems during crisis and promoting medical education via a network of humanitarians in syria, the us, and beyond.

Health
10
International Aid Services - Usa Inc

Ias america exists to promote wellbeing, empower communities, and restore human dignity through human transformation - going beyond relief and development, by investing in people, especially in sub-saharan africa, so that they can realize…

—
11
Syrian American Medical Society-Midwest Foundation

Our mission is to save lives and work to ensure a healthier future for all through medical relief and healthcare development on behalf of Syrian American healthcare professionals. Our vision is to be a leading humanitarian organization,…

Health
12
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy-Usa for Aid & Developmentinc; the most unlike its peers is Franklin Community Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $56,000 · OtherSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITY PRODUCTION FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherUNITY PRODUCTION FOUNDATIONRAHMA RELIEF FOUNDATION: $22,000 · OtherRAHMA RELIEF FOUNDATIONUMMA: $20,000 · OtherUMMAAL-HUDA ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN RELIEF: $10,000 · Other+10 more: $15,240 · Other+10 moreBEVERLY HILLS ACADEMY: $163,500 · EducationBEVERLY HILLS ACADEMYMERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC: $25,575 · InternationalMERCY-USA FOR AI…THE WHITE HELMETS INC: $25,000 · InternationalTHE WHITE HELMET…SUNRISE USA INC: $13,030 · InternationalSUNRISE USA INC+4 more: $2,500 · InternationalSyrian American Council: $25,000 · Human ServicesMedGlobal Inc: $3,000 · HealthNATIONAL ARAB AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · HealthICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterKARAM FOUNDATION: $300 · PhilanthropyFRANKLIN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $60 · Arts & Culture
Other$190,240Education$163,500International$66,105Human Services$25,000Health$4,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,000Philanthropy$300Arts & Culture$60

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEVERLY HILLS ACADEMY: $163,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetMERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC: $25,575 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE USA INC: $13,030 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL ARAB AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKARAM FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen for Humanity: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPURE HANDS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $60 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEVERLY HILLS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC ↗
  • Who funds THE WHITE HELMETS INC ↗
  • Who funds Syrian American Council ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MedGlobal Inc ↗
  • Who funds ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARAB AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Without Limits ↗
  • Who funds KARAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Women for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds PURE HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kashlan FoundationMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kashlan Foundation · The Honest Foundation · The Tabbaa Foundation · The Kadry Foundation · The Symn Foundation · Dearborn Community Center · American Muslim Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Al-Azem Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Al-Azem Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Al-Azem Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Al-Azem Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Al-Azem’s filings →

    More from the funding graph