Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Aileen Getty Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Environment$3.9MPublic Benefit$1.3MPhilanthropy$740kInternational$665kCivil Rights$610kArts & Culture$565kHousing & Shelter$225kHealth$220kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $227k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $738k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA VOLUNTEERS FUND$250,000
SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION$162,500
EMPOWERS AFRICA INC$100,000
UTAH FILM CENTER$100,000
CLINTON FOUNDATION THE$100,000
NATIONAL ARCHIVES FOUNDATION$100,000
REPRESENTATION PROJECT$75,000
INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS$50,000
ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION$50,000
THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION$49,912
ROSE HALL CULTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION$37,500
JENESSE CENTER INC$25,000
JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE$25,000
YELLOW DOT STUDIOS INC$25,000
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $280k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JENESSE CENTER INC: $25k → 14%JENESSE CENTER INC: $10k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%THE CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT: $225k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
MT
WI
NY
MA
NV
CA
UT
MD
AR
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.4M · 20 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
35

Total granted

$6.4M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CALIFORNIA VOLUNTEERS FUND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +876% · 26% of their budget
  • SM
    SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $938k · revenue +148%
  • BH
    BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $725k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • GREENPEACE FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $270k · revenue +7%
  • TC
    THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOODgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $225k · revenue +28%
  • PR
    Project Regeneration
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
2
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
3
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
Climate Imperative Foundation

Climate imperative foundation's mission is to employ science and economics to cut global carbon emissions to secure a better future for all.

Environment
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
8
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
9
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
10
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
11
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Foundation for Aids Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Sports ProgramsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Food Banks and PantriesLocal History MuseumsCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%21%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%31%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%48%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/58
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,507

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/58
Grantees still filing
37/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $937,500 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATIONCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND — $510,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUNDThe Pachamama Alliance — $400,000 · EnvironmentThe Pachamama AllianceTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION — $349,912 · EnvironmentTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTIONGREENPEACE FUND INC — $270,300 · EnvironmentGREENPEACE FUND INCProject Regeneration — $200,000 · EnvironmentProject RegenerationAMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC — $150,000 · EnvironmentThe River Project — $114,500 · Environment+8 more — $330,000 · Environment+8 moreCALIFORNIA VOLUNTEERS FUND — $1,275,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCALIFORNIA VOLUN…+1 more — $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION — $725,000 · HealthBILL HILLAR…ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · HealthELTON JOHN …+2 more — $20,000 · HealthAFRICA FOUNDATION (USA) — $397,000 · InternationalAFRICA FOU…Andes-Amazon Conservancy — $200,000 · InternationalAndes-Amaz…EMPOWERS AFRICA INC — $200,000 · InternationalEMPOWERS A…+1 more — $3,000 · InternationalONWARD TOGETHER FOUNDATION — $300,000 · Civil RightsThe Representation Project — $260,000 · Civil RightsMARCH ON MARYLAND — $50,000 · Civil RightsUTAH FILM CENTER — $400,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL ARCHIVES FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Arts & CultureYELLOW DOT STUDIOS INC — $75,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $25,500 · Arts & CulturePEOPLE V EXTINCTION INC — $200,000 · OtherPEOPLE V EXTINCT…THE CONSERVATION COALITION — $50,000 · OtherTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC — $200,000 · OtherTHE GOOD FOOD IN…KISS THE GROUND — $100,000 · OtherKISS THE GROUNDTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD — $225,000 · OtherTHE CENTER IN HO…PARLEY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $50,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS — $50,000 · Other+21 more — $298,500 · Other+21 more
Environment$3,262,212Public Safety & Disaster$1,280,000Health$845,000International$800,000Civil Rights$610,000Arts & Culture$600,500Other$1,223,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA VOLUNTEERS FUND — $1,275,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $937,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION — $725,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND — $510,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER — $400,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance — $400,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetAFRICA FOUNDATION (USA) — $397,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION — $349,912 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetONWARD TOGETHER FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC — $270,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Representation Project — $260,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD — $225,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetProject Regeneration — $200,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAndes-Amazon Conservancy — $200,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC — $200,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEMPOWERS AFRICA INC — $200,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC — $150,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetThe River Project — $114,500 over 2y, 35% of budgetKISS THE GROUND — $100,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetNATIONAL ARCHIVES FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGLOBAL CONSERVATION — $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYELLOW DOT STUDIOS INC — $75,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClimate Mobilization Project Inc — $55,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMARCH ON MARYLAND — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPARLEY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJenesse Center Inc — $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMODEL ALLIANCE INC — $35,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PROMISES FOUNDATION ATTN BRYAN MOELLER CHAIRMAN — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRiver Phoenix Center for Peace Building Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetCAPITAL & MAIN — $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAND CORE — $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetEVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAVEN PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNDERGROUND MUSEUM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHENRYS HOPE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSUNRISE MOVEMENT EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIGER SANCTUARIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetMALIBU FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…Liberty Hill Foundati…Silicon Valley Commun…California Community …Climate Emergency FundTides FoundationThe California Endowm…United States Energy …ImpactassetsincWeingart FoundationThe San Francisco Fou…Pledgeling Foundation
Marin Community FoundationCA20.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · Climate Emergency Fund · Tides Foundation · The California Endowment · United States Energy Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Weingart Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Pledgeling Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Aileen Getty Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Aileen Getty Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Aileen Getty Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines