Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Aiello Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$38kHuman Services$28kHealth$13kPhilanthropy$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kFood & Nutrition$2kCrime & Legal$1kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTIAN BROTHERS ACADEMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Rescue Mission: $500 → 14%ELMCREST CHILDRENS CENTER: $500 → 14%CHARITY FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%CHARITY FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 14%CHARITY FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 14%FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 14%FRANCIS HOUSE: $5k → 14%FRANCIS HOUSE: $5k → 14%FRANCIS HOUSE: $5k → 14%Advocates Inc: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 7 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +57% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
17

Total granted

$77k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+57%

Still filing today

71%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FRANCIS HOUSE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +68%
  • DF
    DEWITT FOOD PANTRY INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +58%
  • MC
    MCMAHONRYAN CHILD ADVOCACY SITE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS OF CNY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • PF
    People for Haiti Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -89%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +145%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central New York Ronald McDonald House

Housing and programs for sick children and thier families.

—
2
David's House Inc

To provide a home away from home and support for families with children receiving treatment through the children's hospital at dartmouth-hitchcock medical center.

Health
3
St Francis Hospital

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
Children in Conflict Inc

Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

Human Services
5
Children's Home of Jefferson County

Child care, outpatient clinic sepcializing in treatment of behavioral health issues.

Human Services
6
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
7
Carefirst Ny Inc

It is the mission of carefirst ny, inc. to affirm life through extraordinary, compassionate support and care to patients and families in chemung, steuben and schuyler counties.

—
8
Sarah's Guest House Inc

This healthcare hospitality house provides a "home away from home" accomodations to patients and families of patients who are receiving medical care in central new york.

Human Services
9
St Joseph's Hospital Health Center

We, st. joseph's hospital health center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's hospital health center is a member of st.…

Health
10
Ronald Mcdonald House of New York Inc

Our mission is to provide a strong, caring and seamless circle of support for patients of pediatric cancer and other complex illnesses and their families. in recent years rmhny has expanded its footprint across the boroughs and extended…

Health
11
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
12
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elmcrest Children's Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is People for Haiti Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTIAN BROTHERS ACADEMY: $38,070 · OtherCHRISTIAN BROTHERS ACADEMYAMERICAN RED CROSS OF CNY: $2,550 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS OF CNY+12 more: $6,950 · Other+12 moreFRANCIS HOUSE INC: $25,400 · Human ServicesFRANCIS HOUSE INCCHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $9,500 · Human ServicesCHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC+3 more: $1,250 · Human ServicesCENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthMCMAHONRYAN CHILD ADVOCACY SITE INC: $1,000 · HealthDEWITT FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,450 · Food & NutritionDEWITT FIRE DEPT INC: $750 · Public Safety & DisasterOPERATION 300 INC: $500 · Youth Development
Other$47,570Human Services$36,150Philanthropy$5,000Health$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,450Public Safety & Disaster$750Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRANCIS HOUSE INC: $25,400 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $9,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEWITT FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,450 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAYA AND CHRIS KYLE FOUNDATION SERVICE FAMILY STRONG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMCMAHONRYAN CHILD ADVOCACY SITE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELMCREST CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION 300 INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATES INCORPORATED: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert S and Eleanore L Howard Charitable FoundationNY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert S and Eleanore L Howard Charitable Foundation · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Jim and Juli Boeheim Foundation Inc · Kinney Drugs Foundation Inc · Frank and Frances Revoir Foundation · C & S Foundation Inc · Allyn Family Foundation Inc · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Baxter International Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Aiello Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Aiello Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aiello Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph