Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Adikes Family Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates LLP

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$656k
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.9MReligion$713kRecreation & Sports$548kHuman Services$362kEducation$357kAnimals$355kPublic Safety & Disaster$151kFood & Nutrition$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $126k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
$6,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL$100,000
LONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY$50,000
ST JUDE HOSPITAL$50,000
SOUTHERN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY$50,000
SISTER OF THE ORDER OF ST DOMINICK$30,000
DANNY RON'S RESCUE$25,000
NYU Langone - Winthrop Univ Hospita$25,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$25,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$25,000
USET$10,000
RELIGIOUS RETIREMENT FUND$10,000
ISLAND HARVEST$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
DREAM FACTORY$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $266k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 7%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 7%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 7%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 7%ISLAND HARVEST: $10k → 7%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS ASSOC: $5k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS ASSOC: $5k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS ASSOC: $5k → 6%The Viscardi Center: $110k → 6%THE VISCARDI CENTER: $10k → 6%THE VISCARDI CENTER: $10k → 6%THE VISCARDI CENTER: $10k → 6%THE VISCARDI CENTER: $5k → 6%THE VISCARDI CENTER: $5k → 6%The Viscardi Center: $5k → 6%The Viscardi Center: $5k → 6%The Viscardi Center: $5k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS ASSOC: $16k → 6%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS ASSOC: $16k → 6%Family and Childrens Assoc: $16k → 6%Family and Childrens Assoc: $8k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NE
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
TN
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 70 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

70 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
15

Total granted

$4.8M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-10%

Still filing today

33%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $770k · revenue +37%
  • LI
    LONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $400k · revenue +1% · 29% of their budget
  • TV
    THE VISCARDI CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • NW
    NYU WINTHROP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • CW
    CREATIVE WAVES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue -34%
  • LL
    LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
2
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
3
Good Shepherd Hospice Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
4
The Jockey Club

The organization is dedicated to the improvement of thoroughbred breeding and racing. It fulfills that mandate by serving many segments of the industry through its subsidiary companies and by providing support to a wide range of industry…

Recreation & Sports
5
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
6
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
7
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
8
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
Good Shepherd Hospice

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
10
Catholic Health System of Long Island

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

—
11
Chs Services Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
12
The Jockey Club Safety Net Foundation

Established in 1943, the foundation is a charitable trust that provides, on a confidential basis, financial relief and assistance to members of the thoroughbred industry who are in need. assistance is available nationwide, and includes…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc; the most unlike its peers is World Childrens Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
18/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Winthrop University Hospital: $350,000 · OtherWinthrop University HospitalST Jude Hospital: $330,000 · OtherST Jude HospitalSISTERS OF THE ORDER OF ST DOMINIC: $200,000 · OtherSISTERS OF THE ORDER OF ST DOMINICTHE SALVATION ARMY: $150,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL OF THE INCARNATION: $145,000 · OtherSt Aidans RC Church: $140,000 · OtherNorth Shore Univ Hosp Fdn: $120,000 · OtherDANNY RON'S RESCUE: $114,525 · Other+63 more: $1,638,657 · Other+63 moreST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $769,600 · HealthST FRANCIS HOSPITALSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS …+3 more: $31,500 · HealthLONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY INC: $400,000 · Recreation & SportsLONG ISLA…+2 more: $7,250 · Recreation & SportsTHE VISCARDI CENTER INC: $165,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $71,400 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesISLAND HARVEST LTD: $10,000 · Human ServicesEQUUS FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $30,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $22,464 · Animals+1 more: $1,750 · AnimalsSOUTHERN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 · Arts & CultureKENT SCHOOL: $18,000 · EducationINTERCOLLEGIATE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION INC % KFRANCFORTTREAS: $10,000 · EducationCENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC: $10,000 · Education
Other$3,188,182Health$851,100Recreation & Sports$407,250Human Services$291,400Animals$99,214Arts & Culture$82,500Education$38,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $769,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY INC: $400,000 over 9y, 29% of budgetTHE VISCARDI CENTER INC: $165,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $71,400 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY: $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $50,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SILVER SHIELD FOUNDATION INC: $46,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetEQUUS FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $22,464 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENT SCHOOL: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCREATIVE WAVES FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetKEVIN BABINGTON FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCHARITY CLAY SHOOT NY: $13,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetCOCO POINT FUND INC: $12,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION INC % KFRANCFORTTREAS: $10,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOld Westbury Gardens Inc: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUSHJA FOUNDATION INC: $4,750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD CHILDRENS FUND: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVinceremos Riding Center Inc: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRIDE FOR BECCA: $2,500 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetBROOKE USA INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTESTAVERDE FUND FOR SPINAL CORD INJURY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds LONG ISLAND SLED HOCKEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VISCARDI CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SILVER SHIELD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bahnik Foundation IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bahnik Foundation Inc · Davis-McCullough Foundation Inc · The Broder Family Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Adikes Family Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Adikes Family Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates LLP. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Adikes Family Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates LLP?

Find your warmest path to The Adikes Family Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Adikes Family Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates LLP’s filings →

More from the funding graph