Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The 100 Club of Amarillo Inc

To provide assistance to the families of certified peace officers and firefighters who are killed or seriously injured in the line of duty and to provide local law enforcement and firefighting agencies with life- protecting equipment that cannot otherwise be obtained.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Public Safety & Disaster$852kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $31,977 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $98,877 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $66,900 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$31,977
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RANDALL COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT$31,977
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $15k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scotland Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Frelsburg Volunteer Fire Dept

Provide firefighting services for frelsburg, texas area.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Knifley Area Volunteer Fire Department
Public Safety & Disaster
4
Clyde Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire suppression, fire investigation, and search and rescue services to the citizens of clyde and the surrounding rural areas of callahan co., tx.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Taylor Township Volunteer Fire Department
6
Marlin Volunteer Fire Department
7
Strawn Volunteer Fire Department

Provide fire protection and emergency assistance to strawn, texas, and surrounding communities.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Valley View Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer Fire Department that responds to service calls to extinguish fires or help with medical emergencies in the area.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Stickleyville Volunteer Fire Dept

Fire department for the local community of stickleyville, va

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Broadview Volunteer Fire Department

Community volunteer fire deparment

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Littleton Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Provide fire and rescue services to the citizens of our fire district

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Melvin Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miami-Roberts County Volunteer Fire Department Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cal Farley's Boys Ranch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
1/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+54 more — $768,457 · Other+54 moreHOOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHOOVER VO…SKELLYTOWN AREA VOL FIRE AND EMS A — $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSKELLYTOW…STINNETT AREA VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSTINNETT …WELLINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWELLINGTO…MOBEETIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMOBEETIE …MIAMI-ROBERTS COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMIAMI-ROB…CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH — $15,000 · Human Services
Other$968,457Public Safety & Disaster$90,000Human Services$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $15,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSKELLYTOWN AREA VOL FIRE AND EMS A — $15,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetKELTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCANADIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMCLEAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $15,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetWELLINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMOBEETIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetDALHART VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $15,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetMIAMI-ROBERTS COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBRISCOE FIRE DEPT — $15,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
  • Who funds SKELLYTOWN AREA VOL FIRE AND EMS A
  • Who funds KELTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds STINNETT AREA VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CANADIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds MCLEAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
  • Who funds WELLINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Farm Bureau Ag Research & Education FoundationTX39.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Farm Bureau Ag Research & Education Foundation · The Legett Foundation · Gray-Pampa Foundation Inc · Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · M K Brown Foundation Inc · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The 100 Club of Amarillo Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph