Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Texas Farm Bureau Agriculture Research & Education Foundation

Initiate ag research and educational activities, disseminate information regarding education and marketing commodities.

$1.9M
Granted FY2017
39
Grants FY2017
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 39 grants below total $69,225 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,898,357 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,829,132 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$1,775
Median grant
2
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOBEETIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
POTTER COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
KELTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
CANADIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
FARGO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
GAGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
MCLEAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
DALHART VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
GEM CITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
HIGGINS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
SHATTUCK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
ALLISON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
ARNETT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
REYDON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
WAKA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,775
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 41% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 15%PANHANDLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 9%MIAMI-ROBERTS COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 10%DALHART VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 11%ALLISON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 11%GRUVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 11%PERRYTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 12%STINNETT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 12%STRATFORD VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 12%LIPSCOMB COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 14%KELTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 15%MCLEAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 17%WELLINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 17%POTTER COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 20%SHATTUCK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 15%REYDON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 16%WHITE DEER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 9%LOCUST GROVE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 11%SPEARMAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 11%FARNSWORTH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 12%SKELLYTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 12%HIGGINS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 14%WHEELER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 15%LEFORS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 17%GAGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 15%FRITCH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 9%CANADIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 11%WAKA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 11%WOLFCREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 12%FOLLETT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 14%SHAMROCK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 15%HOOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 17%FARGO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 15%GEM CITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 11%DARROUZETT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 14%BRISCOE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 15%ARNETT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 15%BOOKER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 14%MOBEETIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 15%HARMON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scotland Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Frelsburg Volunteer Fire Dept

Provide firefighting services for frelsburg, texas area.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Knifley Area Volunteer Fire Department
Public Safety & Disaster
4
Taylor Township Volunteer Fire Department
5
Marlin Volunteer Fire Department
6
Littleton Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Provide fire and rescue services to the citizens of our fire district

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Matador Motley County Volunteer Fire Department

Fire fighting and prevention

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Valley View Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer Fire Department that responds to service calls to extinguish fires or help with medical emergencies in the area.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Melvin Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Clyde Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire suppression, fire investigation, and search and rescue services to the citizens of clyde and the surrounding rural areas of callahan co., tx.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Claylick Volunteer Fire Department
12
Kinsey Volunteer Fire Dept

Volunteer fire dept

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miami-Roberts County Volunteer Fire Department Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mobeetie Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIPSCOMB COUNTY AREA VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC — $8,875 · OtherLIPSCOMB COUNTY AREA VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INCWAKA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $5,325 · OtherWAKA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT+25 more — $44,375 · Other+25 moreSTINNETT AREA VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION — $1,775 · Public Safety & DisasterSTINNETT AREA VOL…HOOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $1,775 · Public Safety & DisasterHOOVER VOLUNTEER …MOBEETIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $1,775 · Public Safety & DisasterMOBEETIE VOLUNTEE…SKELLYTOWN AREA VOL FIRE AND EMS A — $1,775 · Public Safety & DisasterSKELLYTOWN AREA V…WELLINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $1,775 · Public Safety & DisasterWELLINGTON VOLUNT…MIAMI-ROBERTS COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $1,775 · Public Safety & DisasterMIAMI-ROBERTS COU…
Other$58,575Public Safety & Disaster$10,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIPSCOMB COUNTY AREA VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC — $8,875 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBRISCOE FIRE DEPT — $1,775 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHOOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $1,775 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCANADIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $1,775 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDALHART VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $1,775 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSKELLYTOWN AREA VOL FIRE AND EMS A — $1,775 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetWELLINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $1,775 over 1y, 7.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIPSCOMB COUNTY AREA VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds BRISCOE FIRE DEPT
  • Who funds STINNETT AREA VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds HOOVER VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
  • Who funds MOBEETIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds CANADIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds KELTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds DALHART VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
  • Who funds SKELLYTOWN AREA VOL FIRE AND EMS A
  • Who funds MCLEAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
  • Who funds WELLINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds MIAMI-ROBERTS COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The 100 Club of Amarillo IncTX39.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The 100 Club of Amarillo Inc · The Legett Foundation · Gray-Pampa Foundation Inc · Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · M K Brown Foundation Inc · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas Farm Bureau Agriculture Research & Education Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.9M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph