Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thank Heaven Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$616kHealth$580kArts & Culture$310kHuman Services$198kCivil Rights$125kCrime & Legal$75kRecreation & Sports$8kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$866k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL$25,000
FIRST LIBERTY$25,000
MD ANDERSON CENTER$25,000
SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION$25,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$25,000
MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER$25,000
CHILDREN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
MASTERMEDIA INTERNATIONAL$10,000
PARENTS TELEVISION AND MEDIA COUNCIL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $25k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $25k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $25k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $25k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $15k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $15k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $15k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $15k → 14%BEHIND EVERY DOOR: $1k → 14%BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 17 repeat orgs$595k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$595k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+6%

Still filing today

53%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionEducationCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FR
    FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +63%
  • MR
    MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $150k · revenue +9%
  • FL
    FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $125k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • CO
    Community of Caritas
    one grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue -44% · 41% of their budget
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE-CHPLAINCY PROGRAM
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • MA
    MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
3
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
4
Lifechangers Inc

Distribution of newsletters, production of dvds, cds and publications carrying the message of jesus christ and the kingdom of god to the people throughout the world.

Arts & Culture
5
Intentional Life Media

Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.

Religion
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
8
One for Israel

One for israel's purposes are to unite u.s. and international churches, ministries and individuals for the proclamation of the gospel in israel, to raise funds for evangelism and gospel proclamation, to provide tangible relief for israel's…

—
9
First Look Institute Inc

First Look Institute supports fearless investigative journalism, innovative and cinematic nonfiction filmmaking, and press freedom initiatives to protect the right to a free and open society and press.

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
11
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
12
Faith Baptist Bible College

Post secondary and graduate educational institution The mission of Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary is to equip vocational Christian workers and other servant leaders while inspiring them to take the Word to the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Media Research Center; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MD ANDERSON CENTER: $175,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CENTERCHILDREN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $140,000 · OtherCHILDREN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONPRISON FELLOWSHIP: $100,000 · OtherPRISON FELLOWSHIPUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $45,000 · OtherUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTERPARENTS TELEVISION AND MEDIA COUNCIL: $40,000 · OtherPARENTS TELEVISION AND MEDIA COUNCILJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE-CHPLAINCY PROGRAM: $25,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $25,000 · OtherDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $50,000 · OtherDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc+8 more: $72,833 · Other+8 moreCommunity of Caritas: $500,000 · ReligionCommunity of CaritasMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $150,000 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESEARCH …Mastermedia International Inc: $80,000 · Arts & CultureMastermedia Int…PARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL INC: $40,000 · Arts & CulturePARENTS TELEVIS…FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $160,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RE…BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $125,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $75,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$672,833Religion$500,000Arts & Culture$270,000Human Services$168,500Civil Rights$125,000Education$125,000Crime & Legal$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity of Caritas: $500,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $160,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $150,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMastermedia International Inc: $80,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community of Caritas ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mastermedia International Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thank Heaven Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thank Heaven Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thank Heaven Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Thank Heaven Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thank Heaven’s filings →

More from the funding graph