Skip to content

· Public charity

Texas Sandfest

Is an organization that supports relief of the poor, support education,and awards scholarships to local high school seniors

$470k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MFood & Nutrition$390kArts & Culture$335kReligion$170kPublic Safety & Disaster$149kAnimals$105kHuman Services$81kEnvironment$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $442,919, the rows itemized in this filing. The $469,769 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,850 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $155k
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$255k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORT ARANSAS ISD$280,419
THE HELPING HAND FOOD PANTRY$25,000
VFW POST 8967$25,000
BACA TEXAS INC$20,000
TRINITY BY THE SEA CHURCH$20,000
YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$15,000
PORT ARANSAS POLICE FOUNDATION$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE ARK$10,000
PA PRESERVATION & HISTORICAL ASSOC$10,000
PORT ARANSAS FIRE DEPARTMENT$10,000
PORT ARANSAS EMS$10,000
KEEP PORT ARANSAS BEAUTIFUL$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%NEW LIFE REFUGE MINISTRIES: $10k → 27%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%YOUTH DEV FOUND-PROJECT GRADUATION: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 13 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$2.7M
$188k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-26%

Still filing today

38%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF TEXAS
    6× · 2018–2025 · $180k · revenue +74% · 68% of their budget
  • PA
    PORT ARANSAS ART CENTER
    4× · 2017–2022 · $95k · revenue +76%
  • PA
    Port Aransas Preservation and Historical Association
    5× · 2019–2025 · $75k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • PA
    PORT ARANSAS HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $62k
  • AF
    ANIMAL FRIENDS OF PORT ARANSAS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -26% · 66% of their budget
  • TH
    THE HELPING HAND FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Port Aransas Conservancy Fund
Environment
2
Port Arthur Historical Society

To preserve the historical heritage of the city of port arthur, texas. the society operates the museum of the gulf coast and maintains an historical property: the pompeiian villa.

Arts & Culture
3
Port Aransas Chamber of Commerce Foundation

The core purpose of this organization is to drive a better quality of life for the residents and community of port aransas.

Human Services
4
Port Aransas Tourism Bureau and Chamber of Commerce

We support our community by advocating for sensible development and leading the marketing of port aransas & mustang island

—
5
Friends of the Pecos River
Environment
6
Port Aransas Education Foundation

None

Education
7
Salty Paws of Port Aransas Inc

Provide funding for the very best care to the many homeless animals that come to our local shelters. this includes medical procedures due to injuries, illness, heartworm treatments, foster support, and more.

Animals
8
Port Aransas Conservancy

Foster a balance of conservation and economically sustainable uses for port aransas while recognizing dependence of community and economy on tourism

Environment
9
Friends of the Corsicana Public Library
Education
10
Texas State Rifle Association Foundation Inc
—
11
The Prosthetic Foundation

Providing support and access for uninsured and under-insured Texas amputees to obtain quality prosthetics with comprehensive aftercare, as well as to generate public awareness for these individuals.

Civil Rights
12
Texas Prairieland Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Port Aransas Community Theatre; the most unlike its peers is New Life Refuge Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PORT ARANSAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,369,460 · OtherPORT ARANSAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF TEXAS: $180,000 · OtherVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF TEXASCOMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $175,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCITY OF PORT ARANSAS: $174,000 · OtherCITY OF PORT ARANSASTRINITY-BY-THE-SEA EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $170,250 · OtherTRINITY-BY-THE-SEA EPISCOPAL CHURCH+6 more: $218,000 · Other+6 morePORT ARANSAS COMMUNITY THEATRE: $165,000 · Arts & CulturePORT ARANSAS …PORT ARANSAS ART CENTER: $95,000 · Arts & CulturePORT ARANSAS …Port Aransas Preservation and Historical Association: $75,000 · Arts & CulturePort Aransas …Friends of the ARK Inc: $55,000 · AnimalsANIMAL FRIENDS OF PORT ARANSAS INC: $50,000 · AnimalsYouth Development Foundation of Port Aransas: $43,000 · Human ServicesNEW LIFE REFUGE MINISTRIES: $10,000 · Human ServicesPORT ARANSAS POLICE FOUNDATION: $48,000 · Community ImprovementPORT ARANSAS GARDEN CLUB: $15,000 · Environment
Other$2,286,710Arts & Culture$335,000Animals$105,000Human Services$53,000Community Improvement$48,000Environment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF TEXAS: $180,000 over 6y, 68% of budgetPORT ARANSAS COMMUNITY THEATRE: $165,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetPORT ARANSAS ART CENTER: $95,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetPort Aransas Preservation and Historical Association: $75,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetFriends of the ARK Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetANIMAL FRIENDS OF PORT ARANSAS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetPORT ARANSAS POLICE FOUNDATION: $48,000 over 4y, 44% of budgetYouth Development Foundation of Port Aransas: $43,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetPORT ARANSAS GARDEN CLUB: $15,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetNEW LIFE REFUGE MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds PORT ARANSAS COMMUNITY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds PORT ARANSAS ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Port Aransas Preservation and Historical Association ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the ARK Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL FRIENDS OF PORT ARANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds PORT ARANSAS POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Youth Development Foundation of Port Aransas ↗
  • Who funds PORT ARANSAS GARDEN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE REFUGE MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Bend Community FoundationTX21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Bend Community Foundation · Mary Hobbs Griffith Foundation · Ed Rachal Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Texas Sandfest funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Texas Sandfest. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Texas Sandfest’s filings →

    More from the funding graph