· Public charity
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $197,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $241,073 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $43,323 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Health Services of North Texas Inc | $120,000 |
| University of North Texas | $22,000 |
| Denton Chamber of Commerce | $19,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF DENTON COUNTY INC | $15,000 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CTR FOR NORTH TEXAS | $11,000 |
| denton public school foundation | $5,500 |
| Texas Women's University Foundation | $5,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against -75% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $637k · revenue +78%
- DSDALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION7× · 2017–2023 · $608k · revenue +207%
- UWUNITED WAY OF DENTON COUNTY INC6× · 2017–2024 · $94k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- DCDallas County Indigent Careone grant, 2017 · $3.1M · revenue -100%
- DCDALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTone grant, 2017 · $1.1M
- DFDENTON FESTIVAL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue -75%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Denton Community Health Clinic's purpose is to provide affordable, comprehensive, quality health care to all, regardless of ability to pay.
Provide childcare, afterschool care, and preschool education
Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…
The voice of dentistry in the community, promoting high ethical standards and achieving excellence in advocacy, community service and education.
The dcms foundation's mission is to improve the quality and distribution of health services throughout dallas county.
Crime Stop.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…
The organization was established for the purpose of engaging and conducting charitable, educational, religious and scientific activities for the benefit of its supported organization, dallas county hospital.
DMAC works to preserve, promote, and continue the unique and culturally significant musical and artistic heritage of Denton by providing vital healthcare subsidies for local artists and musicians.
Organize activities to encourage members to volunteer to help with political activities by walking, phone banking, and mailings. also, providing opportunities to ensure betterment of work conditions for members.
Early childhood education
To preserve and promote agriculture and western heritage, and support and encourage youth in their projects, and promote tourism in the city of denton.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Safety Net Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Texas Womans University Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dallas County Indigent Care ↗
- Who funds HEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DENTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Denton Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds TEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DENTON PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds DENTON PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENTON FESTIVAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Plano · Denton Benefit League · Coserv Charitable Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton?
Find your warmest path to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.