Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Texas Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation

The charitable purpose of Texas Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation is to increase the amount of Medicaid funding available to support medical care for the medically indigent population in various counties in the state of Texas.The grant program is designed to increase the flow of Medicaid and other supplemental federal…

$353M
Granted FY2024still arriving
101
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$98M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of Texas Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 101 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $44k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+93 grants · $352M
$1,217,477
Median grant
3
States reached
$75M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTUS Spohn Corpus Christi$98,001,592
CHRISTUS Health Southeast TX$21,057,732
South Texas Health System Edi$20,188,748
Baptist Saint Anthonys Hospi$19,644,408
Scott & White Memorial Hosp$14,984,977
Valley Baptist Medical Center$12,027,467
Laredo Medical Center$9,405,475
Quail Creek Surgical Hospital$8,618,859
Good Shepherd Medical Center$6,674,299
Texoma Medical Center$5,984,085
Dell Seton Medical Center UT$5,842,322
Doctors Hospital of Laredo$5,519,380
CornerstoneHospital of Austin$5,234,658
CHI St Lukes Health Memoria$5,000,000
Paris Regional Medical Center$4,823,127
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Universal Health Services: $6.2M → 7%Baylor Scott & White Medical: $7.1M → 6%Texoma Medical Center: $6.6M → 11%Paris Regional Medical Center: $4.8M → 15%CHI St Lukes Health Memoria: $5.0M → 16%BSW Medical Center Hillcrest: $19.0M → 16%Good Shepherd Medical Center: $12.9M → 16%CHRISTUS Health Southeast TX: $43.5M → 19%Wadley Regional Medical Cente: $5.7M → 19%Baptist Saint Anthonys Hospi: $19.6M → 20%Valley Regional Medical Cente: $7.0M → 23%Universal Health Services: $4.6M → 7%BSW Medical Center Waxahachie: $11.7M → 9%Texoma Medical Center: $6.0M → 11%Providence Health Center: $6.6M → 16%Longview Regional Med Center: $8.9M → 16%Bayshore Medical Center: $5.3M → 16%CHRISTUS Health Southeast TX: $21.1M → 19%Baptist Saint Anthonys Hospi: $9.2M → 20%BSW Medical Center Hillcrest: $5.9M → 16%Good Shepherd Medical Center: $6.7M → 16%CHRISTUS Spohn Corpus Christi: $98.0M → 17%CHRISTUS Health Southeast TX: $8.7M → 19%Quail Creek Surgical Hospital: $8.6M → 20%Scott & White Memorial Hosp: $15.0M → 14%Longview Regional Med Center: $5.3M → 16%CHRISTUS Spohn Corpus Christi: $57.7M → 17%CHRISTUS Health Southeast TX: $6.7M → 19%Laredo Medical Center: $9.4M → 21%St Joseph Regional Health Ce: $4.6M → 22%Scott & White Memorial Hosp: $10.8M → 14%CHRISTUS Spohn Corpus Christi: $29.1M → 17%CHRISTUS Health Southeast TX: $6.0M → 19%Laredo Medical Center: $9.4M → 21%Scott & White Memorial Hosp: $9.4M → 14%Corpus Christi Medical Center: $14.2M → 17%Laredo Medical Center: $8.6M → 21%Doctors Hospital at Renaissan: $22.3M → 27%Steward Health Care: $7.7M → 14%AdventHealth Central Texas: $5.6M → 14%Scott & White Memorial Hosp: $5.8M → 14%Valley Baptist Medical Center: $5.7M → 23%CHRISTUS Good Shepard: $5.3M → 16%Valley Baptist Medical Center: $12.0M → 23%Harlingen Medical Center: $7.4M → 23%Columbia Rio Grande Healthcar: $7.1M → 27%St Davids Healthcare Partne: $30.9M → 10%Dell Seton Medical Center UT: $5.8M → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2B · 116 repeat orgs$43M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

116 repeat relationships — 85 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

116
28

Total granted

$1.2B
$25M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+39%

Still filing today

23%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $194M · revenue +13%
  • CH
    Christus Health Southeast Texas
    6× · 2019–2024 · $89M · revenue +21%
  • SW
    Scott & White Memorial Hospital
    6× · 2019–2024 · $65M · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • BM
    Bayshore Medical Center
    one grant, 2020 · $5.3M
  • CH
    Christus Healthgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4.1M · revenue +32%
  • CC
    Corpus Christi Medical Center
    one grant, 2023 · $3.0M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
2
Scott & White Clinic

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Scott & White Continuing Care Hospital

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Baylor Medical Center at Irving

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Baylor Health Care System

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Lake Pointe Operating Company Llc

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Scott & White Hospital-Marble Falls

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Grapevine

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Scott & White Healthcare

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christus Spohn Health System Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Methodist Hospitals of Dallas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 62 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%3%<5yr16%8%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr11%11%35–55yr14%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%3%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr15%5%20–35yr11%7%35–55yr14%83%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/146
the rest of the field
15%
7,336/50,344

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
31/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

South Texas Health System Edi — $34,331,892 · OtherSt Davids Healthcare Partne — $31,644,581 · OtherLaredo Medical Center — $29,658,705 · OtherBaptist Saint Anthonys Hospi — $28,820,052 · OtherUniversal Health Services — $28,746,310 · OtherDoctors Hospital at Renaissan — $28,601,024 · OtherDoctors Hospital of Laredo — $22,577,974 · Other+112 more — $452,617,905 · Other+112 moreChristus Spohn Health System Corporation — $194,255,405 · HealthChristus Spohn Health System CorporationChristus Health Southeast Texas — $89,389,917 · HealthChristus Health Southeast TexasScott & White Memorial Hospital — $65,464,021 · HealthScott & White Memorial HospitalHillcrest Baptist Medical Center — $26,653,127 · HealthCHRISTUS GOOD SHEPHERD MEDICAL CENTER — $23,153,314 · HealthBaylor Medical Center at Waxahachie — $22,547,064 · Health+29 more — $108,982,714 · Health+29 moreCHRISTUS NORTHEAST TEXAS AND NORTHERN LOUISIANA HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION — $10,351,735 · Religion
Other$656,998,443Health$530,445,562Religion$10,351,735

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChristus Spohn Health System Corporation — $194,255,405 over 4y, 11% of budgetChristus Health Southeast Texas — $89,389,917 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetScott & White Memorial Hospital — $65,464,021 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetHillcrest Baptist Medical Center — $26,653,127 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetCHRISTUS GOOD SHEPHERD MEDICAL CENTER — $23,153,314 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBaylor Medical Center at Waxahachie — $22,547,064 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetMEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF EAST TEXAS — $13,773,845 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetMETROPLEX ADVENTIST HOSPITAL INC — $13,167,386 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetASCENSION SETON — $12,291,841 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetScott & White Hospital Round Rock — $10,739,782 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCHRISTUS NORTHEAST TEXAS AND NORTHERN LOUISIANA HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION — $10,351,735 over 4y, 12% of budgetASCENSION PROVIDENCE — $10,173,854 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER — $9,763,037 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHuntsville Community Hospital Inc — $5,507,787 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetChristus Health — $4,141,555 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBaylor All Saints Medical Center — $3,867,443 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKNAPP MEDICAL CENTER — $3,705,945 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetScott & White Hospital-College Station — $3,356,349 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetChristus Continuing Care — $3,198,876 over 5y, 29% of budgetMISSION HOSPITAL INC — $2,852,729 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetChristus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation — $2,724,455 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Health — $2,464,434 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area — $2,446,257 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetContinueCare Hospital at Hendrick Medical Center Inc — $2,102,837 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetChristus Health Ark-La-Tex — $1,826,087 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER - LIVINGSTON — $1,750,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBaptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas — $1,707,717 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetContinueCare Hospital of Tyler Inc — $1,296,180 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetMother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center — $846,377 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMethodist Hospitals of Dallas — $567,053 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONSPIRIT HEALTH — $460,719 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL — $449,886 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTexas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Stephenville — $221,043 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetComanche County Medical Center Company — $145,365 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Health Resources — $108,101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Mark's Medical Center — $5,429 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBURLESON ST JOSEPH HEALTH CENTER — $5,160 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
  • Who funds Christus Health Southeast Texas
  • Who funds Scott & White Memorial Hospital
  • Who funds Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center
  • Who funds CHRISTUS GOOD SHEPHERD MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie
  • Who funds MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF EAST TEXAS
  • Who funds METROPLEX ADVENTIST HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds ASCENSION SETON
  • Who funds Scott & White Hospital Round Rock
  • Who funds CHRISTUS NORTHEAST TEXAS AND NORTHERN LOUISIANA HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION
  • Who funds ASCENSION PROVIDENCE
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds THE GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPITAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Piney Woods Regional Advisory CouncilTX19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council · Dallas Safety Net Support Corporation · Tarrant Safety Net Support Corporation · American Heart Association Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 155 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph