Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Texas · Public charity

Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council

To serve as a link between area hospitals, pre-hospital providers, and local, state and federal agencies in matters of trauma, healthcare and disaster preparedness and response.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
17
Itemized grants FY2025
18
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$2.3M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$1,751,100
Organizations funded a year
4 to 26
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$629k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Public Safety & DisasterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving16$2.3M0%
FY202418$799k0%
FY202316$651k0%
FY202219$737k11%
FY202120$1.2M25%
FY202011$199k18%
FY20194$18k25%
FY201826$819k50%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$6.0MHealth$971kPublic Benefit$35kEnvironment$13k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Hopkins County EMS$3,104,6107n/a
Fairfield Ambulance Service Inc$827,328812%
UT Health ET EMS$678,3997n/a
Champion EMS$647,15481%
City of Longview$323,0837n/a
City of Paris EMS$142,3883n/a
Tyler Regional Hospital LLC$141,3037n/a
Palestine Principal Healthcar$122,7028n/a
Mother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center$122,66380%
Grapeland VFDEMS$95,3686n/a
Show all 39 grantees
All grantees of Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Hopkins County EMS$3,104,6107n/a
Fairfield Ambulance Service Inc$827,328812%
UT Health ET EMS$678,3997n/a
Champion EMS$647,15481%
City of Longview$323,0837n/a
City of Paris EMS$142,3883n/a
Tyler Regional Hospital LLC$141,3037n/a
Palestine Principal Healthcar$122,7028n/a
Mother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center$122,66380%
Grapeland VFDEMS$95,3686n/a
Lone Star Ambulance 1 LLC$93,8656n/a
Camp County Ambulance Service Corpo$87,81581%
Jacksonville FD EMS$75,1258n/a
UT Health ET Air 1 LLC$72,2318n/a
Titus Regional Medical Center$72,2124n/a
Groveton EMS Inc$69,7566n/a
East Texas Medical Center$59,4681n/a
THD EMS Teague$49,1427n/a
Lifenet Inc$38,22810%
Timpson Volunteer Ambulance Service Inc$24,1454n/a
Mother Frances Hospital - Winnsboro$23,00040%
Northeast Texas Regional Advisory Counci l$22,95326%
Jacksonville Hospital LLC$17,8323n/a
City of Marshall$14,5492n/a
Mims Volunteer Fire Department & Ambulance Service$13,09525%
Waskom Volunteer Fire Department & EMS Services Inc$12,84721%
Pittsburg Hospital LLC$11,2592n/a
E TX Medical Cntr Pittsburg$10,4661n/a
Texarkana-Bowie County FHC$8,1451n/a
E TX Medical Cntr Carthage$6,5321n/a
City of Tyler Parks$6,3191n/a
Henderson Hospital LLC$5,7973n/a
Eustace Volunteer FD$5,0001n/a
UT Health Athens$4,2312n/a
Ut Health Quitman$2,9102n/a
Christus Hopkins Health Alliance$1,68430%
Mother Frances Hospital - Jacksonville$1,61520%
Paris Regional Medical Center$1,4313n/a
Carthage Hospital LLC$1,3272n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFairfield Ambulance Service Inc: $827,328 over 8y, 12% of budgetChampion EMS: $647,154 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMother Frances Hospital Regional Health Care Center: $122,663 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCamp County Ambulance Service Corpo: $87,815 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetLifenet Inc: $38,228 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMother Frances Hospital - Winnsboro: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNortheast Texas Regional Advisory Counci l: $22,953 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetMims Volunteer Fire Department & Ambulance Service: $13,095 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetWaskom Volunteer Fire Department & EMS Services Inc: $12,847 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetChristus Hopkins Health Alliance: $1,684 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMother Frances Hospital - Jacksonville: $1,615 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Texas Essential Healt…Northeast Texas Regio…
Texas Essential Healthcare Partnerships FoundationTX19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation · Northeast Texas Regional Advisory Counci l

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council with peer funders

About Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council

How much does Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council give?
Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council reported 17 itemized grants totaling $2,282,242, out of $2,508,862 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 26 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Safety & Disaster (85%), Health (14%), Public Benefit (0%).
Who are Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Hopkins County EMS ($3.1M), Fairfield Ambulance Service Inc ($827k), UT Health ET EMS ($678k).
Does Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Texas Essential Healthcare Partnerships Foundation, Northeast Texas Regional Advisory Counci l.
Where is Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council based?
Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Piney Woods Regional Advisory Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home