Skip to content

· Private foundation

Terwilliger Family Foundation Charitable Trust C/O Adam Fuller Homrich Berg

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$747k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.7MEducation$860kHousing & Shelter$518kYouth Development$100kRecreation & Sports$35kPhilanthropy$25kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $451k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPILEPSY RESEARCH FUND INC$250,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$225,720
CHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION$125,000
I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION$100,000
OLE MISS ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$25,000
CITY SPRINGS THEATRE COMPANY$10,000
EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA$5,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$4,000
HOLY INNOCENTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BERT'S BIG ADVENTURE: $500 → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
CT
CA
TN
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 13 repeat orgs$418k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
16

Total granted

$4.9M
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+36%

Still filing today

69%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $260k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    4× · 2017–2021 · $367k · revenue +80%
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $80k · revenue +50%
  • NE
    NSORO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $75k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • TI
    THE ISAKSON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • CP
    Chastain Park Conservancy Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +162%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
4
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
5
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
6
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
7
Acmg Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine

Support the american college of medical genetics and genomics' (acmg) educational mission to "translate genes into health" by raising funds to attract the next generation of medical geneticists and genetic counselors, to sponsor important…

—
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
12
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Epilepsy Research Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EPILEPSY RESEARCH FUND INC: $2,853,556 · PhilanthropyEPILEPSY RESEARCH FUND INC+2 more: $9,500 · PhilanthropyHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $447,720 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA: $393,500 · OtherEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GEORGIACHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FOUNDATION INC: $332,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA …HOLY INNOCENTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INC: $143,700 · OtherHOLY INNOCENTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL I…I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN FOUNDA…+9 more: $60,500 · OtherEmory University: $366,500 · EducationEmory Univers…VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNI…NSORO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · EducationNSORO EDUCATI…Vanderbilt University: $30,000 · EducationOLE MISS ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationST FRANCIS DAY SCHOOL INC: $25,000 · Education+3 more: $11,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $3,000 · HealthChampions Community Foundation Inc: $65,000 · Housing & ShelterChastain Park Conservancy Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSt Margarets House: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsCity Springs Theatre: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$2,863,056Other$1,577,420Education$612,500Health$143,000Housing & Shelter$65,000Recreation & Sports$11,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEPILEPSY RESEARCH FUND INC: $2,853,556 over 6y, 50% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA: $393,500 over 7y, 66% of budgetEmory University: $366,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNSORO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetChampions Community Foundation Inc: $65,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetVanderbilt University: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOLE MISS ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST FRANCIS DAY SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChastain Park Conservancy Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCity Springs Theatre: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOVETT SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE ATLANTA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH GEORGIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANCHOR CROSS CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetODYSSEY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Margarets House: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER WELLS FOR AFRICA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERT'S BIG ADVENTURE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA18.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Terwilliger Family Foundation Charitable Trust C/O Adam Fuller Homrich Berg funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Terwilliger Family Foundation Charitable Trust C/O Adam Fuller Homrich Berg. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Terwilliger Family Foundation Charitable Trust C/O Adam Fuller Homrich Berg’s filings →

More from the funding graph