How much did TERESA HUGHES TRUST grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of TERESA HUGHES TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

kona adultpin adultspin childrenadults childrenwestwaikiki

2022

unsolicitedpin childrenpin adultshopemaui

2023

—

2024

—

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k9 grants · $270k
$50k–250k2 grants · $110k

$35,000

Median grant

States reached

$10M

Total assets

Largest grants

FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN'S JUSTICE$55,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN'S JUSTICE$55,000
CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICE$45,000
KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE$45,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII$40,000
HOOLA NA PUA$35,000
ST FRANCIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF$25,000
FRIEND OF THE CHILDREN'S JUSTICE$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN OF$20,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$20,000
HAWAII MEALS ON WHEELS$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $361k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of TERESA HUGHES TRUST’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in HI; read by stated purpose it is 97% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

TERESA HUGHES TRUSTlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.8M · 21 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.8M

$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%

+125%

Still filing today

62%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CA
CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICE
4× · 2021–2025 · $180k · revenue +28%
FO
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN'S JUSTICE
3× · 2023–2025 · $155k · revenue +22%
CC
CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII
4× · 2022–2025 · $146k · revenue +202%

Funded once

SW
SUSANNAH WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +230%
KA
KONA ADULT DAY CENTER
one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -73%
SF
ST FRANCIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF HAWAII
one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Kuakini Medical Center

The mission of kuakini medical center is to improve the health status of the community by: providing comprehensive health care services and programs at reasonable cost; continuously improving the quality of health care services and…

Health

Hawaii Public Radio

To provide non-commercial, cultural and informational programming to the state of hawaii, the nation and international community.

—

Hui Hoolana

Create a self-sustaining facility that supports educational programs and native hawaiian reforestation projects.

Arts & Culture

Hui Malama Ola Na Oiwi

Hui malama ola na 'oiwi is a community-based native hawaiian health care system whose mission is to improve the provision of comprehensive disease prevention, health promotion, and primary care services on hawaii island.

—

Na Pualei O Likolehua

To preserve and perpetuate hula as a living art and dance form.

Arts & Culture

Koolauloa Health Center

The Center is a culturally sensitive, community-based unit which provides comprehensive healthcare services - including medical, dental, and behavioral services primarily to residents in the Koolauloa region of Oahu, Hawaii.

Health

Friends of Hokulea and Hawaiiloa

To perpetuate and teach the hawaiian traditions of building and caring for canoes.

Arts & Culture

Waikiki Health

To provide high quality medical and social services that are affordable and accessible for everyone.

Health

Ho'ola Lahui Hawaii

To improve the health and well-being of our community.

Human Services

Hawaiian Kamali'i Inc

To perpetuate and preserve the art of hawaiian canoe paddling by providing an environment rooted in traditional hawaiian values that promote personal growth, character development, and achievement in physical fitness.

Unclassified

Honolulu Community Action Program Inc

To provide opportunities and inspiration to enable low-income individuals or families to achieve self-reliance.

—

Queen's North Hawaii Community Hospital

Acute care hospital with the mission to to improve health and wellness of the people of north hawaii.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child and Family Service and the most unlike its peers is Molokai General Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

06the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/16

Grantees still filing

14/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,259,250Human Services$361,000Health$195,600Food & Nutrition$40,000Religion$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Pacific Bank FoundationHI26.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Aloha United Way Inc · The Queen's Medical Center · Atherton Family Foundation · McInerny Foundation-- · J Watumull Fund · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg · Hawai'i Pacific Health · First Hawaiian Bank Foundation · The Victoria S and Bradley L Geist Foundation · Tradewind Group Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TERESA HUGHES TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN OF WEST HAWAII INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +88% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 990284839 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN OF WEST HAWAII INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 24% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Teresa Hughes Trust?

Find your warmest path to Teresa Hughes Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TERESA HUGHES TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Teresa Hughes Trust?

More from the funding graph

TERESA HUGHES TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Teresa Hughes Trust?

More from the funding graph