Skip to content
Tennessee Charitable Care Network at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Tennessee Charitable Care Network

The mission of tccn is to support, educate, and represent non-profit organizations that provide charitable healthcare services to low-income, uninsured, and underserved tennesseans.

$4.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$665k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$9.6MHuman Services$11kYouth Development$5k
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
$112,579
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC OF NASHVILLE$665,205
THE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF OAK RIDGE$443,862
MOUNTAIN HOPE GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC$338,601
HEALING HANDS HEALTH CENTER$250,455
FRIENDS IN NEED HEALTH CENTER$199,830
FAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER$177,892
SILOAM FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$171,283
KEYSTONE DENATL CLINIC$141,015
ST MARY'S LEGACY CLINIC$137,565
WELLNESS AND STRESS CLINIC OF MEMPHIS$136,649
KNOXVILLE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE FOUNDATION$133,176
INTERFAITH HEALTH CLINIC$125,682
COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SHELBYVILLE & BEDFORD$114,928
LIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH$113,712
CROSSROADS MEDICAL MISSION$112,579
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $261k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HELPING HANDS OF TENNESSEE: $91k → 15%HELPING HANDS OF TENNESSEE: $65k → 15%Helping Hands of Middle & West TN: $11k → 15%PURPOSE POINT COMMUNITY HEALTH: $70k → 12%PURPOSE POINT COMMUNITY HEALTH: $17k → 12%PURPOSE POINT COMMUNITY HEALTH: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.6M · 31 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
2

Total granted

$9.6M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

90%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ID
    INTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC OF NASHVILLE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +9%
  • FM
    Free Medical Clinic of Oak Ridge
    4× · 2021–2024 · $854k · revenue +169%
  • MH
    MOUNTAIN HOPE GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $710k · revenue +168%

Funded once

  • GS
    GIVING SMILES
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • CH
    Church Health Center
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jonesboro Church Health Center Inc

Our purpose is to address health disparities reduce barriers to care by offering essential medical services to those most in need. Our vision is that every person in our community has access to healthcare regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
2
Macon Volunteer Clinic Inc

Macon Volunteer Clinic (MVC)provides free primary medical and dental care, as well as medication assistance, to uninsured, working adult residents of Middle Georgia. All patients live at or below 200% of federal poverty level.

Health
3
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
4
Christian Health Center of Howard County

The mission of the christian health clinic of howard county is to provide medical services, including dentistry and pharmacy, to the people of the county who cannot obtain medical care because of inability to pay.

Health
5
Hill Country Medical Ministriesinc

To provide high-quality patient-centered services that support healthy living among the uninsured and the under-served families in the greater williamson county.

—
6
Christ Clinic

Providing reliable, accessible, high quality medical services to the most vunerable people in our community.

Health
7
Grace Clinic of Yadkin Valley

Provide medical care to low income and uninsured adults.

Human Services
8
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
9
Hope Clinic and Care Center Inc

To provide health care services in a holistic manner to patients who meet the clinic's eligibility requirements, currently income less than 300% of the federal poverty level.

Human Services
10
East Knox Free Medical Clinic Inc

Free Medical Care

Health
11
Baptist Community Health Services Inc

Motivated by the love and compassion of christ and in keeping with our baptist heritage, bchs provides quality primary healthcare and behavioral healthcare to individuals in medically underserved communities.

Health
12
Medical Outreach Ministries

Provide a christian ministry through operation of one or more charitable medical or dental clinics

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Roberta Baines Wheeler Pulmonary Hypertension Awar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
27/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC OF NASHVILLE: $1,276,580 · HealthINTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC OF NASHVILLEFree Medical Clinic of Oak Ridge: $854,227 · HealthFree Medical Clinic of Oak RidgeMOUNTAIN HOPE GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC: $709,564 · HealthMOUNTAIN HOPE GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INCHEALING HANDS HEALTH CENTER INC: $592,834 · HealthHEALING HANDS HEALTH CENTER INCFriends in Need Health Center Inc: $472,175 · HealthFriends in Need Health Center IncFAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $431,504 · HealthFAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INCLIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH: $341,248 · HealthCROSSROADS MEDICAL MISSION: $340,022 · HealthCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SHELBYVILLE AND BEDFORD COUNTY: $330,859 · HealthINTERFAITH HEALTH CENTER: $320,439 · HealthKARIS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $269,302 · Health+13 more: $1,576,571 · Health+13 moreST MARYS LEGACY CLINIC INC: $335,714 · OtherST MARYS LEGAC…SILOAM HEALTH: $309,406 · OtherSILOAM HEALTHKNOXVILLE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $278,937 · OtherKNOXVILLE ACAD…KEYSTONE DENTAL CARE INC: $258,810 · OtherKEYSTONE DENTA…AMED MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $42,279 · Other+2 more: $35,173 · OtherTHE HEALING WORD COUNSELING CENTER: $362,240 · Youth DevelopmentHelping Hands of Middle & West Tennessee: $167,242 · Human ServicesPURPOSE POINT COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $94,034 · Human ServicesOf One Accord Inc: $190,611 · Food & Nutrition
Health$7,515,325Other$1,260,319Youth Development$362,240Human Services$261,276Food & Nutrition$190,611

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC OF NASHVILLE: $1,276,580 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetFree Medical Clinic of Oak Ridge: $854,227 over 4y, 17% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOPE GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC: $709,564 over 4y, 10% of budgetHEALING HANDS HEALTH CENTER INC: $592,834 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetFriends in Need Health Center Inc: $472,175 over 4y, 11% of budgetFAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $431,504 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetTHE HEALING WORD COUNSELING CENTER: $362,240 over 4y, 36% of budgetLIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH: $341,248 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetCROSSROADS MEDICAL MISSION: $340,022 over 3y, 20% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SHELBYVILLE AND BEDFORD COUNTY: $330,859 over 4y, 11% of budgetINTERFAITH HEALTH CENTER: $320,439 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetSILOAM HEALTH: $309,406 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetKNOXVILLE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $278,937 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetKARIS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $269,302 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetSMILES INC: $240,969 over 4y, 42% of budgetSERVOLUTION HEALTH SERVICES INC: $207,548 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetCHARIS HEALTH CENTER: $194,846 over 3y, 18% of budgetOf One Accord Inc: $190,611 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMEDICAL FOUNDATION OF NASHVILLE: $177,136 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CHATTANOOGA INC: $172,682 over 4y, 11% of budgetHelping Hands of Middle & West Tennessee: $167,242 over 3y, 19% of budgetDICKSON COMMUNITY CLINIC: $149,446 over 3y, 12% of budgetPARTNERS FOR HEALING INC: $146,305 over 3y, 15% of budgetBEERSHEBA SPRINGS MEDICAL CLINIC: $133,979 over 3y, 21% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $99,912 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPURPOSE POINT COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $94,034 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMEDICAL FOUNDATION OF CHATTANOOGA INC: $29,673 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPROVIDENCE MEDICAL CLINIC OF KINGSPORT: $22,856 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetRoberta Baines Wheeler Pulmonary Hypertension Awar: $5,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetMUSIC CITY PREP CLINIC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefSostento IncSouthern Health Plan …Americares Foundation…Smile 180 FoundationTennessee Health Foun…National Association …The Community Foundat…Tennessee Rural Healt…The Healing Trust For…United Way of Middle …Hca Healthcare Founda…
Direct ReliefCA35.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Sostento Inc · Southern Health Plan Inc · Americares Foundation Inc · Smile 180 Foundation · Tennessee Health Foundation Inc · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Tennessee Rural Health Recruitment & Retention Center Inc · The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tennessee Charitable Care Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tennessee Charitable Care Network. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tennessee Charitable Care Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home