Skip to content
Tenfold Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Tenfold Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$270kEducation$243kInternational$154kHuman Services$132kArts & Culture$71kHealth$38kPhilanthropy$15kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$993k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Embrace$26,550
Mission Haiti$20,500
Central Church$15,500
SF Public Schools Education Fund$10,000
Sioux Falls Christian School$8,383
Dordt University$8,000
Lifeline Children's Services$5,000
Heartland Christian Schools$5,000
World Shoe Fund$5,000
University of Sioux Falls$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Bethany Christian Services$2,500
Harrisburg Baseball Association$2,500
Volunteers of America Dakotas$1,500
Fresh Produce LLC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Christian Life Ministries: $2k → 14%Christian Life Ministries: $750 → 14%Emily's Hope: $11k → 5%One Body One Hope: $500 → 8%Emily's Hope: $3k → 5%Emily's Hope: $1k → 5%Emily's Hope: $100 → 5%Children's Home Society: $5k → 9%Children's Home Society: $1k → 9%Children's Home Society: $1k → 9%Sioux Falls Ministry Center: $100k → 9%Call to Freedom: $3k → 9%Call to Freedom: $2k → 9%The Community Outreach: $1k → 9%Call to Freedom: $500 → 9%Compassion Child Care: $5k → 9%The Furniture Mission: $3k → 9%The Furniture Mission: $515 → 9%Ronald McDonald House: $200 → 9%The Community Outreach: $100 → 9%Center of Hope: $138 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
MI
SD
IA
RI
CA
CO
NC
OK
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$708k · 38 repeat orgs$297k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
48

Total granted

$708k
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+22%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SIOUX FALLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +102%
  • MH
    MISSION HAITI
    9× · 2017–2025 · $148k · revenue +26%
  • CM
    COLLISION MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $26k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SIOUX FALLS MINISTRY CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +10%
  • EO
    Emily Ordaz and Jorge Chavira
    one grant, 2022 · $70k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siloam Health

Siloam shares the love of christ by providing affordable, whole-person care to the uninsured & underserved that addresses the physical, emotional, spiritual, & social determinants of health.

—
2
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
3
Child Evangelism Fellowship of South Dakota Inc

Our purpose is to evangelize boys and girls with the gospel of the lord jesus christ, disciple them in the word of god, and establish them in a bible believing church for christian living.

Youth Development
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
6
Siouxland Youth for Christ

To provide youth ministry services to youth in the siouxland area.

Youth Development
7
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
8
Corporate Care of the Sioux Empire

Corporate Care strategizes with workplace leadership to foster an environment of mutual care and service both inside and outside the workplace. Corporate Care provides short-term, on-site pastoral counseling to employees who wish to use…

Religion
9
Youth for Christ Usa Inc Grand Forks Area Youth for Christ

Grand forks area youth for christ reaches young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other like-minded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to prayer…

—
10
St Francis House of Sioux Falls

Ecumenical not-for-profit transitional living facility for the homeless in sioux falls, south dakota. purpose is to offer hospitality, fellowship and support to those who have nowhere to sleep.

—
11
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
12
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Washed Clean Addiction & Recovery Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
32/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Shalom Christian Reformed Ch: $81,388 · OtherShalom Christian Reformed ChEmily Ordaz and Jorge Chavira: $70,155 · OtherEmily Ordaz and Jorge ChaviraEmbrace: $64,050 · OtherEmbraceBethany Christian Services: $33,500 · OtherBethany Christian ServicesCentral Church: $15,500 · Other+66 more: $164,003 · Other+66 moreSIOUX FALLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION: $200,352 · EducationSIOUX FALLS CHRISTIAN SC…DORDT UNIVERSITY: $13,000 · EducationDORDT UNIVERSITY+3 more: $6,500 · EducationMISSION HAITI: $147,667 · ReligionMISSION HAITILIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $24,044 · ReligionLIFELINE CHILDREN'S…+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionTHE SIOUX FALLS MINISTRY CENTER: $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE SIOUX FALLS…Emilys Hope: $15,259 · Human ServicesEmilys HopeCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $7,000 · Human ServicesCALL TO FREEDOM: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASSION CHILD CARE: $5,000 · Human Services+6 more: $8,203 · Human Services+6 moreCOLLISION MINISTRIES INC: $26,100 · Youth Development+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentWashed Clean Addiction & Recovery Ministries: $10,000 · HealthWORLD SHOE FUND INC: $5,000 · HealthLIVE INSPIRED 365 INC: $1,100 · HealthCaringBridge: $1,000 · Health+2 more: $800 · HealthSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · Philanthropy
Other$428,596Education$219,852Religion$172,711Human Services$140,462Youth Development$26,600Health$17,900Philanthropy$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIOUX FALLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION: $200,352 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMISSION HAITI: $147,667 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetTHE SIOUX FALLS MINISTRY CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetCOLLISION MINISTRIES INC: $26,100 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $24,044 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEmilys Hope: $15,259 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWashed Clean Addiction & Recovery Ministries: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALL TO FREEDOM: $5,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOMPASSION CHILD CARE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMPASS CENTER: $4,775 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $3,515 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,950 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN LIFE MINISTRIES: $2,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRIMARY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH: $1,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCaringBridge: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTION OF ROCK VALLEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BANQUET: $893 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM: $825 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEARLESS FOUNDATION: $769 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSIOUX EMPIRE UNITED WAY INC: $510 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE BODY ONE HOPE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFESCAPE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRATION HILLS INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSioux Falls Downtown Lions Club: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAvera McKennan: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTH DAKOTA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE: $138 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION HAITI ↗
  • Who funds THE SIOUX FALLS MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COLLISION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Emilys Hope ↗
  • Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Washed Clean Addiction & Recovery Ministries ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD SHOE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CALL TO FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION CHILD CARE ↗
  • Who funds THE COMPASS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HARRISBURG BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sioux Falls Area Comm…Midcontinent Foundati…South Dakota Communit…Sanford Group ReturnAvera HealthThe Robert and Rita E…The Mike Cindy and Ky…First Interstate Banc…Levo Cares FoundationLarson FoundationSioux Empire United W…The Graco Foundation
Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation IncSD53.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · Midcontinent Foundation · South Dakota Community Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Avera Health · The Robert and Rita Elmen Foundation · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Levo Cares Foundation · Larson Foundation · Sioux Empire United Way Inc · The Graco Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tenfold Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tenfold Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tenfold’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home