Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tempo Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$502kHuman Services$105kHealth$32kHousing & Shelter$28kYouth Development$25kRecreation & Sports$8kFood & Nutrition$2kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$996k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELIAS HIGH SCHOOL$40,000
ST JOSEPH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$10,000
PROVIDENTMARY RIDER HOME$8,000
PETER AND PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SAINT ANN SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION$3,000
UNLIMITED PLAY$2,700
A CARING PLUS FOUNDATION$2,500
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL FOUNDATION STL CHAPTER$1,500
DOWNS SYNDROME ASSOCIATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF ST LOUIS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNLIMITED PLAY: $3k → 5%GUADALUPE CENTER: $3k → 10%UNLIMITED PLAY: $2k → 5%GUADALUPE CENTER: $3k → 10%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF ST LOUIS: $500 → 11%ANGELS ARMS: $2k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Tempo Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tempo Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$667k · 17 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$667k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+67%

Still filing today

53%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationHealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ACCESS ACADEMIES
    4× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +7%
  • PP
    PETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +191%
  • TM
    THE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • LO
    LOVERS OF THE HOLY CROSS
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • CF
    CHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • T
    TASK
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Center-Marygrove

Providing a safe home, compassionate care and high-quality mental health services to children and youth who have experienced significant trauma, to restore their childhood and equip them to productive adulthood.

Health
2
St Louis Center

Serving individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in an intentional, faith-based community.

—
3
St Martin's Child Center

Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri

—
4
Larche St Louis

High quality, 24/7 support in neighborhood homes for persons with intellectual disabilities. inclusive educational opportunities for people in st. louis. changing the way persons with disabilities are seen and highlighting their…

Health
5
St Patrick Partnership Center

To transform lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

—
6
Lutheran Care Center

To provide services and facilities for people whose capabilities and needs vary widely. lcc strives to make the lives of people more independent, healthful, meaningful and secure through development of innovative programs delivered with…

Health
7
Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of Sauk Rapids Minnesota

Good shepherd lutheran home and its affliliates provide personalized housing & health care services for the young & older adults in central minnesota through a continuum of care.

—
8
Endless Options Inc

Endless options provides services to howard county, missouri citizens with developmental disabilities. services currently provided include employment, residential options, day habilitation and personal assistance.

—
9
Peace for Kids

The mission of peace for kids is to provide a comprehensive, quality child development program for a diverse socioeconomic and cultural population. peace for kids is committed to assisting working families with safe, quality child care at…

—
10
Missouri Accreditation of Programs for Children & Youth

Promotion of child care excellence in missouri

Education
11
St Anne Home

St. anne home is a ministry of the felician sisters of north america dedicated to the continued healing mission of jesus christ by providing a continuum of care and supportive services to adults, their families, and their caregivers. st.…

Health
12
St Louis Learning Disabilities Association

To provide children with hope, understanding, and compassion so they can reach their full potential.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Academies; the most unlike its peers is Loaves & Fishes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HELIAS HIGH SCHOOL: $275,000 · OtherHELIAS HIGH SCHOOLST JOSEPH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $72,000 · OtherST JOSEPH EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONROSATI-KAIN HIGH SCHOOL: $52,000 · OtherROSATI-KAIN HIGH SCHOOLBOY'S AND GIRL'S CLUB: $25,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherSAINT ANN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Other+13 more: $51,000 · Other+13 moreMary Ryder Home: $66,000 · Housing & ShelterMary Ryder HomePETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $28,000 · Housing & ShelterPETER & PAUL COMM…A CARING PLUS INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterA CARING PLUS INCACCESS ACADEMIES: $40,000 · EducationGood Shepherd School for Children: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationTHE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION: $10,500 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $8,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,000 · HealthGuadalupe Center Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesUNLIMITED PLAY INC: $4,200 · Human ServicesANGELS' ARMS: $1,500 · Human ServicesPEDAL THE CAUSE: $500 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF ST LOUIS: $500 · Human ServicesCHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsHOPE CREATES: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$515,000Housing & Shelter$109,000Education$43,000Health$20,500Human Services$12,700Recreation & Sports$1,500Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMary Ryder Home: $66,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetACCESS ACADEMIES: $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $28,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT ANN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetA CARING PLUS INC: $15,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetTHE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNLIMITED PLAY INC: $4,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Shepherd School for Children: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetANGELS' ARMS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CREATES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF ST LOUIS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mary Ryder Home ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS ACADEMIES ↗
  • Who funds PETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ANN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds A CARING PLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNLIMITED PLAY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Good Shepherd School for Children ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS' ARMS ↗
  • Who funds CHESTERFIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CREATES ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF ST LOUIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · Pershing Charitable Trust · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tempo Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tempo Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tempo’s filings →

More from the funding graph