Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

Good Shepherd School for Children

Good Shepherd School for Children (Missouri) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $197,328 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($124,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$1.3M
Funders on record
8
Grants received
$197k
Net assets
$1.7M
5/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%
01What it does

What Good Shepherd School for Children does

Mission

Helping children of all abilities reach their potential.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Early Childhood Education: Good Shepherd's Early Childhood Education program is based on creative curriculum. Creative curriculum also works in collaboration with developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs: As published by the National Association for the Education of Young Children NAEYC. We believe children learn from everyone around them and they grow and learn differently. Children construct their own knowledge as a result of their interaction with their world. We provide opportunities for them to explore and grow. The classroom environment enables children to be engaged in positive interactions with their peers and teachers. The environment typically includes the following learning centers, as space and interest of the children allows: block, house corner, table toys, art, sand and water, library, music and movement, and outdoors. With the environment in place, the teacher will See Part III, Ln 4a statement

    $1,168,076 spent$1,132,397 earned by the program
    99% of program spending
  2. Pediatric therapy services: Our Pediatric Therapy services provide year-round physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy and developmental therapy. The services are provided for children who have special needs or delays, ages six weeks to eighteen years, who are students in our early childhood classrooms, are outpatients, and/or are home visit clients. Students served have a variety of special needs including autism, down syndrome, spina bifida, learning disabilities, speech/language disorders and various development delays. Most of the children have multiple special needs. Our pediatric therapy program expands into the community to focus on family support and early childhood intervention and to serve additional children. While our facility is located in west St. Louis county, our pediatric therapy program has touched lives throughout the metropolitan area including families who live in St. Louis City, St. Louis County, and St. Charles County. Children who receive service through our pediatric therapy program receive therapy one to five times See Part III, Ln 4b statement

    $10,874 spent$16,043 earned by the program
    1% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,178,950.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($1.6M)2018 Revenue 106 ($1.1M) Expenses 104 ($1.1M) Net assets 101 ($1.6M)2019 Revenue 105 ($1.1M) Expenses 102 ($1.1M) Net assets 102 ($1.6M)2020 Revenue 84 ($903k) Expenses 99 ($1.1M) Net assets 90 ($1.4M)2021 Revenue 108 ($1.2M) Expenses 102 ($1.1M) Net assets 102 ($1.6M)2022 Revenue 126 ($1.4M) Expenses 120 ($1.3M) Net assets 97 ($1.6M)2023 Revenue 141 ($1.5M) Expenses 126 ($1.4M) Net assets 107 ($1.7M)2024 Revenue 147 ($1.6M) Expenses 146 ($1.6M) Net assets 111 ($1.8M)2025 Revenue 118 ($1.3M) Expenses 127 ($1.4M) Net assets 105 ($1.7M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (118)Expenses (127)Net assets (105)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $2.0M to $1.7M (−12%).

$2.0M
$2.0M
$1.9M
$1.8M
$2.0M
$1.7M
$1.9M
$2.0M
$1.9M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 15% · 2022 16%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

3% of Good Shepherd School for Children’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,352 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$4k
’17
$19k
’18
$22k
’19
−$172k
’20
$61k
’21
$65k
’22
$156k
’23
−$5k
’24
−$99k
’25
0.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Staci Kopp

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed131211121212121211
Joined·+2+0+3+0+0+0+1+2
No longer listed·31200013
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 4 funders, grant income fell $40k → $16k.

3 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 67% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Good Shepherd School for Children’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Good Shepherd School for Children leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

67% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Good Shepherd School for Children.

63%
largest funder
91%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 91% · 2018 96% · 2019 91% · 2020 49% · 2021 62% · 2022 56% · 2023 46% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

71% of Good Shepherd School for Children's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

67% of Good Shepherd School for Children's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $66k that is directly attributable, 95% of it comes from Missouri funders.

NJ
MO
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $132k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Good Shepherd School for Children's revenue grew 18% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−8% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.1mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,398 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like Good Shepherd School for Children

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 16%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
91%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Good Shepherd School for Children: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Good Shepherd School for Children?
Good Shepherd School for Children (Missouri) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $197,328 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($124,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Good Shepherd School for Children have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $197,328 in grants to Good Shepherd School for Children, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Good Shepherd School for Children?
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $124,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Good Shepherd School for Children find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Good Shepherd School for Children →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing