Skip to content
Temple Family Private Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Temple Family Private Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$50kHuman Services$11kInternational$9kHousing & Shelter$5kEducation$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kFood & Nutrition$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Care and Share Southern Colorado$500
Neighbors Helping Neighbors$500
Feeding America$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Neighbors Helping Neighbors: $1k → 23%Neighbors Helping Neighbors: $1k → 23%Neighbors Helping Neighbors: $1k → 23%Neighbors Helping Neighbors: $1k → 23%Neighbors Helping Neighbors: $1k → 23%Neighbors Helping Neighbors: $500 → 23%Neighbors Helping Neighbors: $500 → 23%Neighbors Helping Neighbors: $500 → 23%Neighbors Helping Neighbors: $500 → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$82k · 11 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$82k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
0%

Still filing today

82%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    THE ORION SOCIETY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +4%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +76%
  • LP
    LA PUENTE HOME INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +497%

Funded once

  • PB
    PAUL BRUNTON PHILOSOPHIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -48%
  • EA
    EcoVillage at Ithaca NYCenter for T
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • NM
    NAMGYAL MONASTERY INSTITUTE OF BUDDHIST STUDIES
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Bread for the World Institute

To provide analysis and education on hunger issues in the United States and around the world.

International
9
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
10
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
11
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
12
Rainforest Action Network

Rainforest Action Network (RAN) works toward a world where the rights and dignity of all communities are respected and where healthy forests, a stable climate and wild biodiversity are protected and celebrated.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Central Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is Neighbors Helping Neighbors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ORION SOCIETY INC: $23,250 · EnvironmentTHE ORION SOCIETY INC350ORG: $21,500 · Environment350ORGNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $3,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCLA PUENTE HOME INC: $5,000 · OtherLA PUENTE HOME …Care and Share Southern Colorado: $4,000 · OtherCare and Share …EcoVillage at Ithaca NYCenter for T: $1,000 · OtherEcoVillage at I…NAMGYAL MONASTERY INSTITUTE OF BUDDHIST STUDIES: $1,000 · OtherNAMGYAL MONASTE…CRESTONE PERFORMANCES INC: $500 · OtherEcoVillage at Ithaca NY: $500 · OtherUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,700 · InternationalUNITED STATES F…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL K…International Rescue Committee INC: $3,000 · InternationalInternational R…NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $7,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS…MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $3,500 · EducationFeeding America: $2,500 · Food & NutritionPAUL BRUNTON PHILOSOPHIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Environment$48,250Other$12,000International$11,700Human Services$7,000Education$3,500Food & Nutrition$2,500Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ORION SOCIETY INC: $23,250 over 8y, 0.6% of budget350ORG: $21,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $7,000 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLA PUENTE HOME INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL BRUNTON PHILOSOPHIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCRESTONE PERFORMANCES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ORION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds LA PUENTE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds PAUL BRUNTON PHILOSOPHIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRESTONE PERFORMANCES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Temple Family Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Temple Family Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Orion Society Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Mcdonogh School Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Temple Family Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home