· Private foundation
Teja & Leanora Jouhal Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $32k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $31,500 |
| OCULUS EYE HOSPITAL | $9,500 |
| BANGA COLLEGE FUND - PRINCE BANGA | $2,500 |
| JIMMIE HALE MISSION | $1,000 |
| BIG OAK RANCH | $1,000 |
| COMMUNITY SOUP BAWL INC | $1,000 |
| THE HINDU TEMPLE AND CULTURAL | $1,000 |
| CHILDREN VILLAGE | $1,000 |
| HEIFER INTERNATIONAL | $1,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $1,000 |
| RAINBOW OMEGA | $1,000 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| ST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL | $125 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 59% of grant dollars ($186k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 41% that went abroad ($132k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 41% of all-years giving ($132k)
2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against -37% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RORAINBOW OMEGA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +35%
- BOBIG OAK RANCH INC8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +105%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +145%
Funded once
- JLJANDIALA LOK BHALAI MANCHone grant, 2017 · $20k
- KAKHALSA AID INTERNATIONALone grant, 2020 · $15k
- VHVESTAVIA HILLS LIBRARY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Saving lives of vulnerable children and families globally.
Our mission is to be a safe haven for children and to provide them with a loving, nurturing environment. children's village provides life changing hope for children who are victims of neglect, abuse or abandonment through licensed…
Provide pediatric care to underserved communities
Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)
To share healthy food with hungry people, care for the sick by providing necessary healthcare, and equipping women and children across the globe with the knowledge they need to live self-sufficiently.
Share believes every person counts. together we pursue a stronger community by building relationships, advocating for equitable access to housing and food stability while empowering every individual to grow and thrive.
Shelter, support & supervision of homeless children
Since 1994, the mission of international children's heart foundation (ichf) is to bring the skills, technology and knowledge to diagnose and care for children with congenital heart disease to developing countries that request our help.…
Aladdin shriners hospital association for children, inc. (ashac) was formed for the purpose of receiving; investing; and disbursing bequests, devices, gifts and donations for the hospitalization, care, and treatment of children,…
Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shriners Hospitals for Children and the most unlike its peers is Share & Care Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VESTAVIA HILLS LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW OMEGA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SOUP BOWL INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN JIMMIE HALE MISSION ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Share & Care Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Navigate Affordable Housing Partners Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Teja & Leanora Jouhal Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.