· Private foundation
Teeem Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $229k
- $250k+1 grant · $590k
Anchored by a single position: about 92% of reported assets are held in Bank Of America 8906.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEEEM INC | $590,000 |
| GEORGE BADIEL FOUNDATION | $48,561 |
| THE DENAN PROJECT | $40,000 |
| GRACE PROJECT INC | $20,925 |
| RIDGEWOOD CAMBODIA PROJECT | $20,000 |
| ONE SPIRIT | $20,000 |
| MISSION FOR UKRAINE FOUNDATIOM | $20,000 |
| NYAKA AIDS ORPHANS PROJECT | $20,000 |
| AWAMAKI US | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TEC | $20,000 |
| BRIDGES 2030 INTERNATIONAL | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION | $2,000 |
| LTHS ARTS | $1,800 |
| AMLE | $1,800 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TITEEEM INC3× · 2023–2025 · $790k · revenue +217% · 27% of their budget
- GBGEORGIE BADIEL FOUNDATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $160k · revenue +43%
- GPGRACE PROJECT INC3× · 2023–2025 · $123k · revenue +25% · 65% of their budget
Funded once
- AACTone grant, 2023 · $10k
- IIRCone grant, 2023 · $10k
- GOGLOBAL OPS GROUP UKRAINEone grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our commitment to providing accessible clean water extends beyond the boundaries of countries, continents, and cultures. We are driven by a shared belief in the power of technology to transform lives, uplift communities, and create a more…
Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.
Foster education and actions for sustainable development
To initiate, encourage and finance sustainable development in uganda, concentrating on schools and education
To strengthen young women's civic participation and leadership
The center for international private enterprise (cipe) is a non-profit global organization that works to strengthen democracy and build competitive, resilient markets in many of the world's most challenging environments. working alongside…
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEEEM INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIE BADIEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE DENAN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NYAKA INC ↗
- Who funds ONE SPIRIT ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc ↗
- Who funds MISSION FOR UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AYITI COMMUNITY TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES 2030 INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIAL STUDIES ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Teeem Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Teeem Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teeem Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- National Council for the Social Studies: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Teeem Inc?
Find your warmest path to Teeem Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Teeem’s filings →