Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Teeem Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$833k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$590k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Philanthropy$810kInternational$457kEnvironment$160kCommunity Improvement$123kHuman Services$85kEducation$2kSocial Science$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $229k
  • $250k+1 grant · $590k
$3,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$24M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position — about 92% of reported assets are held in Bank Of America 8906.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEEEM INC$590,000
GEORGE BADIEL FOUNDATION$48,561
THE DENAN PROJECT$40,000
GRACE PROJECT INC$20,925
ONE SPIRIT$20,000
MISSION FOR UKRAINE FOUNDATIOM$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TEC$20,000
NYAKA AIDS ORPHANS PROJECT$20,000
AWAMAKI US$20,000
RIDGEWOOD CAMBODIA PROJECT$20,000
BRIDGES 2030 INTERNATIONAL$3,000
COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LTHS ARTS$1,800
AMLE$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TEC: $51k → 15%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TEC: $20k → 15%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TEC: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MI
NY
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
MD
DE
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 10 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$23k

Still filing today

90%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesSocial SciencePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TEEEM INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $790k · revenue +217% · 27% of their budget
  • GB
    GEORGIE BADIEL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $160k · revenue +43%
  • GP
    GRACE PROJECT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $123k · revenue +25% · 65% of their budget

Funded once

  • A
    ACT
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • I
    IRC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • GO
    GLOBAL OPS GROUP UKRAINE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Nile Global Corp

Our commitment to providing accessible clean water extends beyond the boundaries of countries, continents, and cultures. We are driven by a shared belief in the power of technology to transform lives, uplift communities, and create a more…

International
2
Jameil Aikeem Congo Cares Foundation
Health
3
United States Partnership for Education for Sustainable Developme

Foster education and actions for sustainable development

Education
4
Uganda Development Initiative

To initiate, encourage and finance sustainable development in uganda, concentrating on schools and education

International
5
Ceda International

To strengthen young women's civic participation and leadership

6
Building Schools in Africa
Education
7
Global United Foundation
International
8
Vision for Africa
Religion
9
Worldwide Friends of Ugandan Orphans Inc
Human Services
10
Roots International Ltd
Community Improvement
11
AKADEMIYA2063

AKADEMIYA2063's overall mission is to create, across Africa, state-of-the-art technical capacities to support African Union Member States to achieve the key goals of Agenda 2063 of transforming national economies to boost growth and…

International
12
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgie Badiel Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Teeem Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEEEM INC — $790,000 · PhilanthropyTEEEM INCGEORGIE BADIEL FOUNDATION INC — $159,519 · InternationalGEORGIE BADIEL FOUNDATION I…THE DENAN PROJECT INC — $157,135 · InternationalTHE DENAN PROJECT INCMISSION FOR UKRAINE FOUNDATION — $59,554 · InternationalMISSION FOR UKRAINE FOUNDAT…AYITI COMMUNITY TRUST INC — $20,346 · International+1 more — $3,000 · InternationalONE SPIRIT — $84,786 · Human ServicesONE SPIRITAmerican Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc — $78,508 · Human ServicesAmerican Fr…GRACE PROJECT INC — $123,141 · Community ImprovementNYAKA INC — $94,915 · Recreation & SportsRIDGEWOOD CAMBODIA PROJECT INC — $40,676 · OtherAWAMAKI US — $20,000 · OtherACT — $10,000 · OtherIRC — $10,000 · Other+9 more — $9,532 · OtherCOUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION — $2,000 · Social ScienceNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIAL STUDIES — $1,200 · Social Science
Philanthropy$790,000International$399,554Human Services$163,294Community Improvement$123,141Recreation & Sports$94,915Other$90,208Social Science$3,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEEEM INC — $790,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetGEORGIE BADIEL FOUNDATION INC — $159,519 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE DENAN PROJECT INC — $157,135 over 3y, 33% of budgetGRACE PROJECT INC — $123,141 over 3y, 65% of budgetNYAKA INC — $94,915 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetONE SPIRIT — $84,786 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetAmerican Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc — $78,508 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAYITI COMMUNITY TRUST INC — $20,346 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIAL STUDIES — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEEEM INC
  • Who funds GEORGIE BADIEL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE DENAN PROJECT INC
  • Who funds GRACE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds NYAKA INC
  • Who funds ONE SPIRIT
  • Who funds American Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc
  • Who funds MISSION FOR UKRAINE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AYITI COMMUNITY TRUST INC
  • Who funds BRIDGES 2030 INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIAL STUDIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Teeem IncNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Teeem Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Teeem Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • National Council for the Social Studies0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2024

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Teeem Inc?

Find your warmest path to Teeem Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph