Skip to content
Teamsters Local 1932 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Teamsters Local 1932

It is the mission of TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 to provide the best possible service to all our members with integrity and equality; to advance the social, economic, and educational welfare of the membership; to promote professional working relationships and fair play between members and management alike; and to positively contribute to the…

$253k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$143kYouth Development$141kEducation$135kHuman Services$40kCivil Rights$38kPhilanthropy$28kHealth$21kHousing & Shelter$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $97,630, the rows itemized in this filing. The $253,245 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $155,615 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH HELPERS INC$32,215
WORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION$15,000
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 CHARITY$10,000
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 63 CHARITY$9,715
STAGECOACH DAYS ASSOCIATION$8,500
RAZA GOLF FOUNDATION$6,200
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF 42 JOINT COUNCIL$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Christmas Cheer All Year: $7k → 14%Christmas Cheer All Year: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$456k · 13 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$456k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-5%

Still filing today

85%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YH
    YOUTH HELPERS INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $114k · revenue +88%
  • IB
    International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council
    7× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +17%
  • TL
    TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 CHARITY
    4× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +438%

Funded once

  • TL
    TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 TRAINING CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -42%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue -74%
  • WW
    WE WILL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

—
2
Teamsters' Joint Council No 7

To promote better working conditions for members.

—
3
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010

To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.

—
4
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 137

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—
5
Teamsters Local 1932

It is the mission of teamsters local 1932 to provide the best possible service to all our members with integrity and equality; to advance the social, economic, and educational welfare of the membership; to promote professional working…

—
6
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 631

To organize all workers and to seure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.

—
7
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
8
California Trucking Association

To promote the common interests of those engaged in california's trucking industry.

—
9
Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers- Local No 773

To organize workers and to secure improved wages, benefits and working conditions.

—
10
Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 252

The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…

—
11
California Transportation Foundation

At California Transportation Foundation (CTF) our mission is simple. We recognize the best and brightest in our industry with our Annual CTF Transportation Awards program. We remember those who have given all in service to the people of…

—
12
General Teamstersprofessional & Technical Employees Local Union 916

To provide support for its members through labor negotiations, collective bargaining agreements and by working towards eliminating unfair labor practices.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters 848 All Charities Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Teamsters Local 1932 Training Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council: $67,000 · OtherInternational Brotherhood of 42 Joint Co…TEAMSTERS LOCAL 63 CHARITY: $20,230 · OtherTEAMSTERS LOCAL 63 CHARITYNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $19,640 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT…LOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUN…RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $7,500 · OtherWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $18,000 · OtherWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INCCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $15,500 · OtherCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INCThe Christmas Cheer All Year Program: $13,000 · OtherThe Christmas Cheer All Year ProgramSTAGECOACH DAYS ASSOCIATION: $8,500 · Other+3 more: $18,700 · Other+3 moreINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $55,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROTHERH…JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $45,000 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL…UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORPORATION AT CSUSB: $7,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES…ASSOCIATED STUDENTS CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO: $7,500 · EducationASSOCIATED STUDENTS CA…YOUTH HELPERS INC: $113,907 · ReligionYOUTH HELPERS INCTEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 CHARITY: $30,000 · EmploymentTEAMSTERS LOC…TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 TRAINING CENTER: $25,125 · EmploymentTEAMSTERS LOC…WORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EmploymentWORKER SOLIDA…TEAMSTERS 848 ALL CHARITIES FUND INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $8,028 · PhilanthropySAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS EMPLOYEES BENEFIT ASSOC-CHARITY FUND: $16,950 · Youth DevelopmentWE WILL FOUNDATION: $10,231 · Youth DevelopmentTRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $21,325 · Health
Other$210,070Education$115,000Religion$113,907Employment$70,125Philanthropy$28,028Youth Development$27,181Health$21,325

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH HELPERS INC: $113,907 over 6y, 17% of budgetInternational Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council: $67,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $55,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $45,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 CHARITY: $30,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetTEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 TRAINING CENTER: $25,125 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetTRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $21,325 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTEAMSTERS 848 ALL CHARITIES FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS EMPLOYEES BENEFIT ASSOC-CHARITY FUND: $16,950 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $15,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSTAGECOACH DAYS ASSOCIATION: $8,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $8,028 over 1y, 26% of budgetUNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORPORATION AT CSUSB: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATED STUDENTS CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEAMSTERS NATIONAL BLACK CAUCUS: $6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…Teamsters Local 986 C…International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…City Employees Union …International Brother…The Bank of America C…Amazonsmile Foundation
International Brotherhood of 063 TCWHCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc · International Brotherhood of 848 Tcwh · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · International Brotherhood of 911 TCWH · International Brotherhood of 572 TCWH · City Employees Union Local 237 Ibt Afl-C · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teamsters Local 1932 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teamsters Local 1932. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Teamsters Local 1932’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home